IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-sas-idr-maxprefix-inbound-02.txt

Melchior Aelmans <melchior@aelmans.eu> Wed, 16 June 2021 21:12 UTC

Return-Path: <melchior@aelmans.eu>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBE83A26E7 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.088
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.088 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=aelmans.eu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 14En-ykid4v2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 662A93A26E4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id e33so3085640pgm.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=aelmans.eu; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=g+CUXBQqPF3tBs8Mcl0zI2+RQD4JcZskPGmA4WNdk34=; b=Nyy5HEl4kUL54AuKYupXFg3BLpFi5/MzNmPAGHD6Pvwlj0gf1Zq0qkKAYMorqZWleH SG3+SSKL2HOujDwMunVZpzJ+K+HTFOR1tZagt6BR2lX2XV/472EueNXAZQeyiPpBCxjH lSgqng1QRfM4Kf7Zn2kZRCTv3USW4b41AmFldXeTnxh48/k1vNS9MuUKkgd6UAslef7h QgzRDHjYKTtiVx0zb4CtgxVWQiXU4RTl/OoJZdT5IImLB3Io13tQrMhOyRri3KIwDDmd 2K4MsCvB+YP6tDO4X2b4/S3LedF4TtHfrc6RnD8nDU7vDf2WASZ1IL77PTY5ADenq0Vi NkkA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=g+CUXBQqPF3tBs8Mcl0zI2+RQD4JcZskPGmA4WNdk34=; b=SOKkxcOuZfSD3soCBbl9nNfuyN2XExtr9SujhsJ2T0gcTv1DqcFSqBrHVC7MT6G4r2 ddKXYpYnLswLpIAWyNz3BDvVjsRIdp+YwNRU4Mw8JHq5OCzBynT3EA3tbLODoKDjZdXA RjS1rVoxCjudUwm4PAe8piS6C/mI0DbcS10sByOxoGNx1JS4X+CT93ig0wsWjaKEIvvC adJUK0WOk7qG+gQkCTrIKLsfJEjGX47fZXHppdoyDnJfeSienfZLr3CMfyQUh+sMCdAj S55vVQSQRSReiJaToFk39utCv6ucpXR6fflmNCpIbIwfy6w66MydGubEevfaFDoDn/Wx 3DlQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kXJ4guNzRfnrS9iSclA2uVl8JMJizTfGrKLakYVc/IIb5npa0 DoaRGuHqKy8fbHCx26yLX0XG+E5r5ALzfqQmm1u6i+AQyx5pseKEcRE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwzH7IiAmK/0dY9cu0vCzI6YNMajUCLj5c/Bw1yG8PEgc6Fibe5h/gwBOchU0CwuvhJqP90bVXCAEO4iv2alqw=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:d511:: with SMTP id c17mr1544051pgg.219.1623877926019; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 14:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOj+MMH=cCgtn7cL=HvOjQOMH1B9tmjOYOT04jXE9oky4SuevQ@mail.gmail.com> <YHhJTB51/joiz9Pg@snel> <CAOj+MMEFOGm=hCQcZNAUoN8vsPeVT3gqnjsQihUMJo4AOObZfw@mail.gmail.com> <CALxNLBhtQDDo9Dn7vBAZx+RbVwJ5BSbZfRS1wGStt_k7C2nPuQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOj+MMHDPGt30deY6KtC+E-5eD9Q8cRtrL-xydLhsNic7KBdSw@mail.gmail.com> <CALxNLBi5Borzgr6ntRZHu0P6dnEcoZ8pk7=JKKfRhNcUbv873w@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV2mUP2f8sKdqOEde35U6a5idY+XGWNf0G2rzheRULhmmw@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR11MB3207A318E89779FDBE4F1EDFC0529@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMGpsLcdPynRWOiUK6-8Gx+MtwtPyOBLJDW8EsXknWXJ1w@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV3d0OXUurMkcbB-hC1LT-dtRTV464p_9v84SdBcH_FbNQ@mail.gmail.com> <YJ1IfGrUylekt2xk@shrubbery.net> <CAH1iCioH8X-r12P=m=Bg8b5s+GHuJth-2MAw_tmsZz=caS_B8Q@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV0-_rGgDuQbrrStcDM_-_wUb828FWWN57Jn5KO+WSPvrQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV0-_rGgDuQbrrStcDM_-_wUb828FWWN57Jn5KO+WSPvrQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Melchior Aelmans <melchior@aelmans.eu>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 23:11:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CALxNLBj2U=pi1NmEP9zxYnfKFhsyUt-Y2nn4Kag8ASgpE_Xt3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Dickson <brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com>, heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, Melchior Aelmans <maelmans@juniper.net>, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f077e605c4e88ac2"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/kCeOlzV0_VcXh_pI4mie-nM6eAo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-sas-idr-maxprefix-inbound-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 21:12:13 -0000

Dear WG, commenters,

Thanks for all the suggestions and great discussion.

I have just uploaded -03  (
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-sas-idr-maxprefix-inbound)
version which includes the following statement:

Operators SHOULD take special care when applying soft-
         reconfiguration inbound, as it could still expose control plane
         to exhaustion if no pre-policy limits are available or are not
         configured.  Implementations SHOULD provide means to configure
         two thresholds for inbound limits.  One before soft-
         reconfiguration inbound and one after soft-reconfiguration
         inbound.  This is to prevent soft-reconfiguration inbound to
         exhaust control plane resources.  The threshold before soft-
         reconfiguration inbound SHOULD be higher than the limit
         configured after soft-reconfiguration inbound.


Does that make sense and addresses the issue? Please advise.

Thanks!
Melchior

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 1:13 AM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I understand for documentation purposes being in the draft.  I am in
> agreement as highlighted by Jacob & Robert.
>
> Gyan
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 4:13 PM Brian Dickson <
> brian.peter.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:44 AM heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Wed, May 12, 2021 at 11:14:51PM -0400, Gyan Mishra:
>>> > +1 more for implementation not for draft
>>>
>>> I disagree; that has helped create the inconsistencies among impls.
>>> Document
>>> it.
>>>
>>
>> I also disagree, for the reasons highlighted by Jakob and Robert.
>> It needs to be in the draft.
>>
>> Brian Dickson
>>
>
>
> --
>
> <http://www.verizon.com/>
>
> *Gyan Mishra*
>
> *Network Solutions A**rchitect *
>
> *Email gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com <gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com>*
>
>
>
> *M 301 502-1347*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email