Re: [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07

John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> Thu, 30 April 2020 22:01 UTC

From: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
CC: Theresa Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>, "last-call@ietf.org" <last-call@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07
Thread-Index: AQHWHAk75ZAJ7AKCd0+g8f3zWYvwt6iRg4EAgAC6FAA=
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:00:58 +0000
Message-ID: <2DFA4CC4-0ABD-43B1-BF49-714260E0784F@juniper.net>
References: <158793289621.976.611584354541089569@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAMMESswRzxL_Zf+uVn=xH8acJ7cjsPDScNMdZv+0n_uLdg49gw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMMESswRzxL_Zf+uVn=xH8acJ7cjsPDScNMdZv+0n_uLdg49gw@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A2C9164F98DA37409FC68BCAD213D6B7@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 039c4a54-38e5-4335-23e3-08d7ed51f6e5
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 30 Apr 2020 22:00:58.5581 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: YMCndGpSd8+/2MWy91us4IPP2NzHXqv8u3smmPqxYqYx4PizxKV+GGBPTuLwiIMe
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BL0PR05MB5633
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-30_13:2020-04-30, 2020-04-30 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 spamscore=0 malwarescore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1011 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004300162
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/kyHPtIpi4zyNEFjudj8cK8NdAh0>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-capabilities-registry-change-07
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:01:09 -0000

Hi Alvaro,

I’ve just uploaded -08 with your requested changes, also with the extra explanatory introduction text Theresa suggested (thanks!).

—John

> On Apr 30, 2020, at 6:54 AM, Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> [External Email. Be cautious of content]
> 
> 
> On April 26, 2020 at 4:28:18 PM, Theresa Enghardt wrote:
> 
> 
> Theresa:  Hi!  Thanks you for the review!
> 
> John:  Please make the changes below before the document is discussed
> by the IESG.
> 
> 
> Thanks!!
> 
> Alvaro.
> 
> 
> ...
>> Regarding the code points that are now assigned as "First Come First Serve"
>> in Section 3, the document points to drafts for some of them, but not for
>> all. Is there any documentation for the code points that are currently
>> without any reference? If so, please provide a reference. If not, maybe it's
>> worth briefly stating that for some of them there is no reference and that
>> they are all deprecated, e.g., because they were used in past experiments.
> 
> Yes -- for consistency they should either all include a reference
> (which is available) or not.  Because of their nature, I would rather
> if all just pointed to "(this document)" to avoid confusion with
> continued work.
> 
> BTW, we should also be consistent in the "prestandard" tagging: add
> the tag to the 185 entry.
> 
> 
>> For code point 129, a reference to a draft is provided in the "Description"
>> column, while for code point 185, a reference to a draft is provided in the
>> "Reference / Change Controller" column. Is this intentional? If not, please
>> consider unifying the presentation here. Otherwise, please consider making
>> clear why the references are in different columns.
> 
> s/draft-li-idr-flowspec-rpd/Routing Policy Distribution

[Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-idr-c… Theresa Enghardt via Datatracker
Re: [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i… Alvaro Retana
Re: [Idr] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-i… John Scudder
Re: [Idr] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of dr… Alissa Cooper