Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large communities (Attribute 30) was squatted on..)

Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa-networks.co.uk> Fri, 28 October 2016 12:59 UTC

Return-Path: <thomas.mangin@exa-networks.co.uk>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EC4E129571 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:59:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pexpsX7LPSJS for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:59:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out-5.mail.exa.net.uk (out-5.mail.exa.net.uk [82.219.4.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D44F1293DC for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 05:59:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-2.mail.exa.net.uk (smtp-2.mail.exa.net.uk [82.219.5.2]) by out-5.mail.exa.net.uk (ExaSMTPD) with ESMTP id 283461C00DC; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:59:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from smtp-2.mail.exa.net.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp-2.mail.exa.net.uk (ExaSMTPD) with ESMTP id 15E144047E; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:59:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from bluemind.exa.net.uk (bluemind.exa.net.uk [82.219.13.108]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-2.mail.exa.net.uk (ExaSMTPD) with ESMTPS; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:59:40 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [82.219.13.108] (bluemind.exa.net.uk [82.219.13.108]) by bluemind.exa.net.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9054D1120EC9; Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:59:39 +0100 (BST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa-networks.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <0F5E21B8-81A4-49E4-9B33-8320DB92ECFD@exa-networks.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:59:38 +0100
References: <CAL9jLaZcCwBhUEs7cvsx3HfiPSRPXrcvOguCeuV2opSns9OZMw@mail.gmail.com> <677CE346-EFED-42B6-8A9F-75ABD2B4D6B4@cisco.com> <EBCE3CE8-1295-4CB2-9A1A-8BA2E154033D@gmail.com> <6e6a37a2a51eab848e9d498a1437365f@www.lamehost.it> <524D6F67-AAFA-4880-B977-8262333DFF5B@steffann.nl> <20161027095404.GP37101@Vurt.local> <CAH1iCipJNye8fpvFwBwoLkL3+=rWVcZac2BUFVcJXQ_9YTrXvg@mail.gmail.com> <BB1CCBAD-F278-4309-8520-06CC9FD825BD@exa.net.uk> <20161028110851.GA966@Vurt.local> <m237jgk97g.wl-randy@psg.com> <20161028122402.GB966@Vurt.local>
To: job@ntt.net
In-Reply-To: <20161028122402.GB966@Vurt.local>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at outbound1.mail.exa.net.uk
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/lNOvNAqgIZVtAlnLnN67Q01dnbU>
Cc: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, IETF IDR <idr@ietf.org>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, Thomas Mangin <thomas.mangin@exa.net.uk>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Squatters (Was: BGP Attribute for Large communities (Attribute 30) was squatted on..)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 12:59:44 -0000

So... Should it recommend treat as withdraw if seen in the wild wild DFZ ?

Thomas
---
from my iPhone

> On 28 Oct 2016, at 13:24, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>; wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 08:24:19PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
>>>> Finally, should a document be also published to officially kill
>>>> attributes 30 and 31 asking implementations to treat as withdraw (or
>>>> discard) any routes using them ?
>>> 
>>> I've asked the chairs for guidance whether that should be part of the
>>> IANA considerations in the large communities draft or whether it
>>> should be a separate document.
>> 
>> no brainer.  this now has nothing to do with large communities.
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129-00