Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016
"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Wed, 06 April 2016 10:02 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BB6812D177 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 03:02:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.749
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.749 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, T_MIME_MALF=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e-5Zwu-MoWyx for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 03:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61E2712D09C for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 03:02:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=31.133.139.85;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Wunan (Eric)'" <eric.wu@huawei.com>, jgs@juniper.net
References: <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A650841013EA@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <0F26584357FD124DB93F1535E4B0A650841013EA@szxema508-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 06:01:15 -0400
Message-ID: <00dd01d18feb$4b2aaeb0$e1800c10$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00DE_01D18FC9.C41C1BF0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQE5ftPIKcbeMqHzTC1cY3QOR/AVtaCs2AmA
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/lPhS-MgWQVYVOexdyLt3krmivcY>
Cc: idr@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 10:02:31 -0000
Eric: Thank you for your question about the following drafts: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-redirect-tunnel/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-redirect-generalized- sid/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandevelde-idr-flowspec-path-redirect / This is just the thing to begin to talk about on the list as part of the adoption process. We'll spend some time discussing the pros/cons of these drafts on the list. Sue From: Wunan (Eric) [mailto:eric.wu@huawei.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2016 11:07 PM To: Susan Hares; jgs@juniper.net Cc: idr@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016 Hi Susan, John, I think what Lucy said makes sense. Based on what I learnt, instead of talking about the same thing with different names, those three I-Ds below seems to have different abstraction levels and scope. I'm not sure whether "a common mechanism" will be better, but WG needs to talk about the possibility. Regards Eric ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 19:24:45 +0000 From: Lucy yong <lucy.yong@huawei.com> To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016 Message-ID: <2691CE0099834E4A9C5044EEC662BB9D5726FC5A@dfweml501-mbb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I support adoption of followings: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eddy-idr-flowspec-packet-rate/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-nvo3/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-idr-bgp-flowspec-label/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-idr-flowspec-interfaceset/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yong-idr-flowspec-mpls-match/ The following three drafts are related to flow redirect, suggest having a common mechanism to address flow redirect instead of several and usage rules to prevent loop. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-redirect-tunnel/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-redirect-generalized- sid/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandevelde-idr-flowspec-path-redirect / Lucy From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 9:47 AM To: 'idr@ietf. org' Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016 IDR WG: This begins a 2 week WG Call (3/25 to 4/8/2016) for the set of drafts to be considered in RFC5575 additions. These options are filters, actions or critical security additions. The flow specification work has been a part of the interims since IETF 94 https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/02/08/idr/proceedings.html https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/03/07/idr/proceedings.html There will be a brief flow specification presentation at IETF 95, and the email list has select to start with option 1 - extending RFC5575. We also will be gathering details on the SDN/NFV use case for option 2 (new NLRI and Wide Communities support). This is a group call for the drafts to be considered in the flow specification work. For each of the drafts you wish to be considered Option 1, please indicate: 1) If this option is valuable for the DDoS deployments or another critical deployments, 2) Do you feel this draft is useful, but not ready for adoption, 3) Do you feel this draft is a good start for this work. The drafts to consider are: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eddy-idr-flowspec-packet-rate/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-nvo3/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-redirect-tunnel/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-redirect-generalized- sid/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-idr-bgp-flowspec-label/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-idr-flowspec-interfaceset/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandevelde-idr-flowspec-path-redirect / https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yong-idr-flowspec-mpls-match/ And for the ordering of these filters and actions drafts - the Option 1 section out of this https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-idr-flowspec-combo/ (A revised draft with just Option 1 will be posted) Sue Hares and John Scudder -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/attachments/20160401/bb13ec9d/ attachment.html>
- [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specif… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Mohammed Mirza (mohamirz)
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Russ White
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Dongling Duan (duan)
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Lucy yong
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Steven Cheung (stecheun)
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Khatri, Paresh (Nokia - AU)
- [Idr] 答复: WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Youjianjie
- [Idr] 答复: WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Liangqiandeng
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Haoweiguo
- Re: [Idr] 答复: WG Adoption call for drafts for Flo… Linda Dunbar
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Wunan (Eric)
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Ignas Bagdonas
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Zhuangshunwan
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Gunter Van De Velde
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Susan Hares
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Smith, Donald
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Van De Velde, Gunter (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Sp… Acee Lindem (acee)
- [Idr] adoption of five flowspec drafts [was: Re: … John G. Scudder
- [Idr] flowspec tunnel/path/sid drafts next steps … John G. Scudder