Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA4C3A110E for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:11:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.098 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tix.at Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DaoaudbKmBZf for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.fbsd.host (mail.fbsd.host [IPv6:2001:858:58::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA8763A110B for ; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 14:11:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tix.at; s=rev1; h=Date:To:References:Message-Id:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type: From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=OdkazJFXZSsw+diaR5OjjLFbP7ZChwUXpHsz2I2p9xc=; b=FNV/X22sVSnopgnIqcJgSQ0Jjk +YLRtBmdu5HVUJZbPa00t6CIaJdD5T5ptmMU+VU7uS+/Cj2jaaj7rTbfB6E8xungXIej6J4QtZNVA Lvqow5uHhNRgSmJadDYPnCwyIJ5zgS3lxEoLEujVLrr2tfqfB7DJGywJpvokj5K06n2AW7rFOK081 O3JcD5cYBzp1YRioK8FEfJtIINxqzmsxNHYGs4buu8MFvhYSkML5hUz6koOnLGHn9bZSop0WV9Qau LepiAnybp41pyVlFqQ5DrNldPqKeLyqzkc47Cg3DIbdittW49XLkUFYBM5TPQJZMndKXBnKVBUpbS sc2pObdQ==; Received: from 213-225-13-127.nat.highway.a1.net ([213.225.13.127] helo=[192.168.88.217]) by mail.fbsd.host with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from ) id 1jPBmx-000OGX-8W for idr@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:11:13 +0200 From: Christoph Loibl Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_BB95CB6B-9AB0-4C00-A22A-7D4F5188592B" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\)) Message-Id: References: <158707090832.17830.2874378176498907427@ietfa.amsl.com> To: IDR List Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:11:09 +0200 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5) X-Scanned-By: primary on mail.fbsd.host (78.142.178.22); Thu, 16 Apr 2020 23:11:11 +0200 Archived-At: Subject: [Idr] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-21.txt X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 21:11:24 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_BB95CB6B-9AB0-4C00-A22A-7D4F5188592B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii IDR,=20 I just uploaded the -21(!) revision of the rfc5575bis draft to correct = the nits pointed out by the latest reviews. A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-21.txt has been successfully submitted by Christoph Loibl and posted to the IETF repository. Name: draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis Revision: 21 Title: Dissemination of Flow Specification Rules Document date: 2020-04-16 Group: idr Pages: 37 URL: = https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-21.txt = Status: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis/ = Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-21 = Htmlized: = https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis = Diff: = https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-21 = Cheers=20 Christoph --=20 Christoph Loibl c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at --Apple-Mail=_BB95CB6B-9AB0-4C00-A22A-7D4F5188592B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii IDR, 

I just uploaded the -21(!) revision of the rfc5575bis draft = to correct the nits pointed out by the latest reviews.

A new version of I-D, = draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-21.txt
has been successfully submitted by = Christoph Loibl and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name: draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis
Revision: 21
Title: Dissemination of Flow Specification = Rules
Document = date: 2020-04-16
Group: idr
Pages: 37
URL: =            <= a = href=3D"https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-21.= txt" class=3D"" style=3D"font-family: Menlo-Regular; font-size: = 11px;">https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-21.t= xt
Status: =         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis/
Htmlized: =       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-21
Htmlized: =       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis=
Diff: =           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=3Ddraft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-21

Cheers 
Christoph

-- 
Christoph = Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 = | http://www.nextlayer.at



= --Apple-Mail=_BB95CB6B-9AB0-4C00-A22A-7D4F5188592B--