[Idr] Do you mind that draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-05.txt has IPR? [6/9/2019 to 6/16/2019]

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Sun, 09 June 2019 17:08 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C181200B2; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 10:08:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.948
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bO8IqciQ5lWS; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 10:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DC8F12003F; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 10:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 13:08:45 -0400
Message-ID: <091201d51ee5$ff9e34c0$feda9e40$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0913_01D51EC4.788DCD40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdUe5PNA7jedxjiUS8iWY6SiS4kR/A==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190609-2, 06/09/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/lncnr5QbHjkrbhqo51XnaJk-Mi4>
Subject: [Idr] Do you mind that draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd-05.txt has IPR? [6/9/2019 to 6/16/2019]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 17:08:51 -0000



This 2 week WG call to determine if the WG wishes to do a WG LC on

If you wish the IDR WG to consider a WG LC, then indicate "support" in your

If you wish the IDR WG to not consider a WG LC due to the IPR, then please
indicate "no support" in your comments. 


If you wish to provide additional comments for the authors as we head toward
WG LC, then please add these comments. 


The chairs read all comments related to a WG LC (including those with this
IPR call). 


Normally we do the calls at the same time, but the authors need to revise
the draft to address concerns from the shepherd.   Therefore, I'm pushing
ahead with the IPR call - so we can focus on the technical issues when
-06.txt is submitted. 



Sue Hares 


How to check IPR



You can look at the IPR by clicking on the IPR button associated 




The IPR can be looked at directly at: 



Jeff Tantsura (one of the inventors) indicates these IPRs are on 1 patent.