[Idr] Re: Adoption call for IANA Registrations for the BGP Finite State Machine (FSM) (ending 31 May, 2024)

[tom petch <[e-mail]>]

I may go through all the names to see if they are exactly the same as in the RFC but may not have time to in the next five days.  They look ok at first reading.

This thought is triggered by 
1- the Abstract
which contains a [reference]
and which uses 'this draft'
and seems inconsistent as to 'Finite State Machine' or 'finite state machine' - I think that the former is better.

All of which suggests that some editing may be needed.

Tom Petch

_______________________________________
From: Jeffrey Haas <[e-mail]>
Sent: 24 May 2024 15:37
To: [e-mail]
Subject: [Idr] Adoption call for IANA Registrations for the BGP Finite State Machine (FSM) (ending 31 May, 2024)

The IDR Chairs are starting a one week adoption call for the IANA
Registrations for the BGP Finite State Machine (FSM) document:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hhp-idr-bgp-fsm-iana/

It has been realized as part of working on current IDR documents that there
is a need for coordinating elements from the RFC 4271 BGP FSM.  In
particular, session attributes, and event names and numbers.

Existing WG documents will receive assignment in the draft prior to the
creation of the IANA registry to help move those documents forward in the
publication process.  Currently, those include:

draft-ietf-idr-bgp-sendholdtimer
draft-ietf-idr-bgp-bfd-strict-mode

Additionally, the registry and its maintenance will become more important if
the Working Group takes up the task to move BGP forward in the IETF
standards process.

Please send your comments for this draft to the mailing list by 31 May, 2024.

-- Jeff (for the Chairs)

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list -- [e-mail]
To unsubscribe send an email to [e-mail]