Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-aigp-11.txt

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Mon, 02 December 2013 15:01 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E617E1AE0D1 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:01:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pz6j08tQSiMs for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias92.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.92]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F721AE425 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 07:01:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm09.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 965B92DC13F; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:01:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme1.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.1.186]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 70B9423808B; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:01:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from PEXCVZYM11.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::a441:e6a9:6143:6f0f]) by PEXCVZYH01.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:01:11 +0100
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com
To: "erosen@cisco.com" <erosen@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-aigp-11.txt
Thread-Index: AQHO5tCPuoSGo+bDGECi5cTVyQxP7JpBDJAQ
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:01:10 +0000
Message-ID: <22845_1385996471_529CA0B7_22845_7151_6_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A070A9CDC@PEXCVZYM11.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <6307.1385048646@erosen-linux>
In-Reply-To: <6307.1385048646@erosen-linux>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.197.38.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2013.12.2.94815
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-aigp-11.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 15:01:37 -0000

Eric,

Thank you for the updated draft.

Version 10 of the draft had:

> 5. Deployment Considerations
> 
>   Using the AIGP attribute to achieve a desired routing policy will be
>   more effective if each BGP speaker can use it to choose from among
>   multiple routes. Thus is it highly recommended that the procedures of
>   [BESTEXT] and [ADDPATH] be used in conjunction with the AIGP
>   Attribute.

In v11, you replaced [ADDPATH] by [CONN-REST]. Could you please elaborate on the reason? (A priori, I find [ADDPATH] more applicable than [CONN-REST]).

Thank you,
Regards,
Bruno

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Eric Rosen
>Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 4:44 PM
>To: idr@ietf.org
>Subject: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-aigp-11.txt
>
>I have revised this draft per the WG Last Call comments:
>
>- Error handling for a malformed AIGP attribute is "discard attribute".
>
>- An AIGP attribute with the transitive bit set is regarded to be malformed,
>  and is to be discarded.
>
>- Stated explicitly that the AIGP value used in bestpath computations is the
>  value of the first AIGP TLV in the attribute.
>
>- The requirement to default "AIGP_SESSION" to "enabled" on IBGP sessions
>  has been demoted from "MUST" to "SHOULD".  This reflect the fact that
>  there is some controversy about it, but no real consensus to default it to
>  "disabled".
>
>- Stated that the AIGP value is capped at its maximum (unsigned) value,
>  i.e., it should not wrap around due to addition.
>
>  Also stated that if an AIGP attribute is received and its value is already
>  the maximum, the attribute should be treated as malformed.  (It's not
>  really useful if you can't add to it.)
>
>I would like to thank those of you who commented during the last call, and
>would welcome comments on the changes.
>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.