IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)

"John G. Scudder" <jgs@cisco.com> Tue, 10 October 2006 17:14 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXLBF-0003pw-Ug; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:14:13 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXLBE-0003pL-Lu; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:14:12 -0400
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com ([64.102.122.148]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GXLBD-0002c8-FN; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:14:12 -0400
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Oct 2006 10:14:11 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,291,1157353200"; d="scan'208"; a="45537809:sNHT44440232"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k9AHEBZ7024273; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:14:11 -0400
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (rtp-jgs-vpn1.cisco.com [10.82.179.66]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with SMTP id k9AHE9DN002464; Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:14:10 -0400 (EDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06230916c151848c2527@[10.0.1.2]>
In-Reply-To: <E1GX06V-0006wb-4J@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
References: <E1GX06V-0006wb-4J@stiedprstage1.ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 13:14:01 -0400
To: iesg@ietf.org
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Last Call: 'Canonical representation of 4-byte AS numbers' to Informational RFC (draft-michaelson-4byte-as-representation)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=246; t=1160500451; x=1161364451; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=jgs@cisco.com; z=From:=22John=20G.=20Scudder=22=20<jgs@cisco.com> |Subject:Re=3A=20[Idr]=20Last=20Call=3A=20'Canonical=20representation=20of=204-by te=20AS=0A=20numbers'=20to=20Informational=20RFC=20(draft-michaelson-4byte- as-representation) |To:iesg@ietf.org; X=v=3Dcisco.com=3B=20h=3DOjXQuNGhOTIGgIBYbh28tMSyR40=3D; b=i2tx0XdXuKshi/YfNnECkbdUkArRcKQmBX3WN9DORFNLAACh3T7pRG4GCOVNcZggf8WHqyFk umLlBDuy/P5OUmU2mLRuNpCWE5Unyle1xCdj+jMNoGPkHJNu5NKGEV5u;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com; header.From=jgs@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( sig from cisco.com verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 8ac499381112328dd60aea5b1ff596ea
Cc: idr@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

I'm inclined to agree with others who've expressed a slight 
preference for a simple decimal integer representation.  I think the 
(lack of) technical issues with doing so has already been pretty well 
captured in the conversation.

--John

_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email