Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Mon, 24 April 2017 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D76131905 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ifNTa3afPFyb for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:09:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33FD5129418 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id f76so44798077qke.2 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vvjYCC5MHgimIoDQdrm07xliNgOJG7GX3OqxO4Dt2mY=; b=0aHK2BA7CI8S1cUsOz8gD0ZsgV1axiqk3ljIuRFRpZJevU+ebhDgJzFuPTIJX5IkGf BcjVQMBd+Plaviqr0nZfo1gEkmJ0I4siCRD5jVk391URrnV9qA6AreLBiFeRYBcfpsGc LC+LO2c4gdzvXsrIJ+dvk63HmJpDekACYVyeSZVMBR/+xKuKbZl0ORxFxr/kHS9SC7Dx 4njm/JG98Xxb5YbprEUiA29coskgXIEnkestuIrEtZkDkjqkB3yqcNnZ6qc4PYGVw/Ch 4iatS9+KEdvcs1wi/C+p0T4c22VlEohWrE4SR/2Hoc8lHsmPxe98as5loJug1sXY11QB /5kw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=vvjYCC5MHgimIoDQdrm07xliNgOJG7GX3OqxO4Dt2mY=; b=Ix9McZjUh2DDjCw+JS7faiEKBssxl39SIIs01R4GXMXKly/gCL48g4offFc2YHXsJf u8HGVRsbgLlha6v1K7cQEGChdLZQB+HxV3cq5cHYH+FU/ABNeAnNl4r26TLvBwS/oYzk rPJ7cmcAIZTaRrU627uxIOMPBnIVryxK6MjIQnZENQUBxCTrT9qHFwd0+EFA25ER7UyY B00YdlQhyasmyQAyOiLSyvaHWoe9NuIwFq8TStaHhGcdBMfNsQ0W347oVCpPp21U9eSc qB74Z1EG/599uL9QA0QivdAjkJBg7Tvbq/ceU2wVFKSUlxIy8PL6/tewIXHnTlov9kI0 Wkng==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4Zb9kmVbPeF0nO8qWp6eB/s3XoOINQvY27YHA+HsPnuVOungnY U2CDRS92OpqjbA==
X-Received: by 10.55.141.67 with SMTP id p64mr14251314qkd.195.1493057358104; Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:09:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([76.8.75.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n22sm2525908qkn.8.2017.04.24.11.09.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Apr 2017 11:09:16 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 14:09:15 -0400
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
To: Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170424180915.daq42kw74cayeewv@Vurt.local>
References: <4CE4AF1E-0C80-423E-B19D-5750FCAFAD89@juniper.net> <23283_1492759950_58F9B58E_23283_375_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31CC352B@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170421084638.l6pbvtznfsxnq2wy@Vurt.local> <23291_1492766305_58F9CE61_23291_9725_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31CC399E@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170421095839.sralcy7aos5mzzic@Vurt.local> <d57ed214-945a-54b8-e04f-cb8610f789e4@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704231447550.5591@uplift.swm.pp.se> <ee6e3ad8-d5c2-16c5-4464-3473d9a6443a@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1704240928120.5591@uplift.swm.pp.se> <09173019-86ee-4f81-d57f-f664d642f633@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <09173019-86ee-4f81-d57f-f664d642f633@cisco.com>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/mMpqAlVGOCCkQXo3oexPysYpCiY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IETF LC for IDR-ish document <draft-ietf-grow-bgp-reject-05.txt> (Default EBGP Route Propagation Behavior Without Policies) to Proposed Standard
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:09:21 -0000

On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:02:45AM -0700, Enke Chen wrote:
> It appears that you have missed a bunch of discussions in the thread.
> 
> The CLI migration falls apart when a customer skips releases and jumps
> from one release ("permit all") to another ("deny all").

Only if they don't read release notes, do not perform any testing, do
not use a staggered deploy, missed the announcements through the NOGs,
missed the customer briefings.

Kind regards,

Job