Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt (Extended until 7/30/2021)

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 23 July 2021 20:37 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C05023A1850; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.348
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.399, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lih1M3fE-Eye; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C1673A184E; Fri, 23 Jul 2021 13:37:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.119.54;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Acee Lindem \(acee\)'" <acee@cisco.com>, <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: <draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org>
References: <02ea01d77ffb$056d0a70$10471f50$@ndzh.com> <7F6E8F93-84D0-4B34-967A-B6BB17C94CBC@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7F6E8F93-84D0-4B34-967A-B6BB17C94CBC@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 16:36:56 -0400
Message-ID: <036e01d78002$7f2af2d0$7d80d870$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_036F_01D77FE0.F81FE280"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHbK6LZm6gsEtG/ZWqPv3JLeeWljgJV47o8qzb9s4A=
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/nGJNtYRfD9ae6J6JIvuPCaFJVAU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt (Extended until 7/30/2021)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 20:37:17 -0000

Acee: 

You are correct that I did not count all the IPR responses.  

I agree that this draft is long overdue and widely implemented. 

 

Just need a few more IDR members to send in comments.

 

Sue 

 

From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 4:25 PM
To: Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt (Extended until 7/30/2021)

 

Hi Sue, 

I guess you didn’t count my IPR response as a contributor? I also support publication – it is long due for a draft that has been widely implemented. 

Thanks,
Acee

 

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Friday, July 23, 2021 at 3:44 PM
To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt (Extended until 7/30/2021)

 

The 2 Week WG LC is extended until 7/30/2021. 

 

Please comment on the WG LC. 

We have only had 7 responses including authors. 

This level of comments is not enough to approve 

This draft. 

 

Thank you, Sue 

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 1:27 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt

 

This begins a 2 week WG LC for the draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt. 

(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy/)

 

This draft has an IPR statement (see https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2984/) so the IDR working group members should consider this in their review. 

 

This draft has 3 reported implementations (Cisco IOS-XR, Arista EOS, and Juniper).  You can see the information reported at: 

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy%20implementations%20

 

The draft describes a new BGP SAFI with a new NLRI for advertising a candidate path of a Segment Routing Policy. 

 

In your comments consider if this draft is:  

a) ready for publication, 

b) benefits deployments of segment routing, 

c) uses the new sub-TLVs for tunnel encapsulation attribute in appropriate ways, 

d) adequately describes the new technology. 

 

Thank you, Susan Hares