Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt (Extended until 7/30/2021)

Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 23 July 2021 20:37 UTC

From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'Acee Lindem (acee)'" <acee@cisco.com>, idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org
References: <02ea01d77ffb$056d0a70$10471f50$@ndzh.com> <7F6E8F93-84D0-4B34-967A-B6BB17C94CBC@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <7F6E8F93-84D0-4B34-967A-B6BB17C94CBC@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2021 16:36:56 -0400
Message-ID: <036e01d78002$7f2af2d0$7d80d870$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_036F_01D77FE0.F81FE280"
Thread-Index: AQHbK6LZm6gsEtG/ZWqPv3JLeeWljgJV47o8qzb9s4A=
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/nGJNtYRfD9ae6J6JIvuPCaFJVAU>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt (Extended until 7/30/2021)
Precedence: list

Acee: 

You are correct that I did not count all the IPR responses.  

I agree that this draft is long overdue and widely implemented. 

 

Just need a few more IDR members to send in comments.

 

Sue 

 

From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] 
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2021 4:25 PM
To: Susan Hares; idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt (Extended until 7/30/2021)

 

Hi Sue, 

I guess you didn’t count my IPR response as a contributor? I also support publication – it is long due for a draft that has been widely implemented. 

Thanks,
Acee

 

From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Friday, July 23, 2021 at 3:44 PM
To: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: "draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt (Extended until 7/30/2021)

 

The 2 Week WG LC is extended until 7/30/2021. 

 

Please comment on the WG LC. 

We have only had 7 responses including authors. 

This level of comments is not enough to approve 

This draft. 

 

Thank you, Sue 

 

From: Idr [mailto:idr-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Susan Hares
Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 1:27 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Cc: draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy@ietf.org
Subject: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt

 

This begins a 2 week WG LC for the draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy-13.txt. 

(https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy/)

 

This draft has an IPR statement (see https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2984/) so the IDR working group members should consider this in their review. 

 

This draft has 3 reported implementations (Cisco IOS-XR, Arista EOS, and Juniper).  You can see the information reported at: 

https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy%20implementations%20

 

The draft describes a new BGP SAFI with a new NLRI for advertising a candidate path of a Segment Routing Policy. 

 

In your comments consider if this draft is:  

a) ready for publication, 

b) benefits deployments of segment routing, 

c) uses the new sub-TLVs for tunnel encapsulation attribute in appropriate ways, 

d) adequately describes the new technology. 

 

Thank you, Susan Hares

Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment… Susan Hares
Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment… Susan Hares
Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment… Majumdar, Kausik
Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment… Acee Lindem (acee)
Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment… Susan Hares
Re: [Idr] 2 Week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-segment… Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)