Re: [Idr] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11

Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com> Wed, 14 December 2016 14:20 UTC

Return-Path: <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 936471299E8; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:20:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.796
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.796 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KAzuSu8SXs7D; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:20:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 012711296D0; Wed, 14 Dec 2016 06:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unnumerable.local ([47.186.56.40]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uBEEK811012009 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=OK); Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:20:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rjsparks@nostrum.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host [47.186.56.40] claimed to be unnumerable.local
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
References: <07906876-6e21-2df9-c7a0-1270e76fea4e@nostrum.com> <20161212191159.GF75593@Vurt.local> <8dc27460-a500-3948-0a61-da4dd2baf66b@nostrum.com> <f4a5b4be6cb94663ae5c98b7780f122e@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
From: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <a3758712-fae6-9ca0-b6d8-a59e1b68181e@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 08:20:10 -0600
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <f4a5b4be6cb94663ae5c98b7780f122e@XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/nMY__YA15Gc7AbsLt9uvs6jYGBE>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, General Area Review Team <gen-art@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-large-community.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-large-community.all@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Genart LC review: draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 14:20:14 -0000


On 12/12/16 2:32 PM, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
>>> Jakob Heitz responded to the suggestion to extend the reserved Global
>>> Administrator values, but for some reason I can't find that email in the
>>> IETF IDR archive, I've copy+pasted it here:
>>>
>>> -------------
>>> 	Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2016 03:16:52 +0100
>>> 	From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>;
>>> 	To: David Freedman <david.freedman@uk.clara.net>;
>>> 	Cc: "idr@ietf.org"; <idr@ietf.org>;
>>> 	Subject: Re: [Idr] New Version Notification for draft-ietf-idr-large-community-11.txt
>>>
>>>       No new text is required to cover this: 23456 is not an ASN.
>>>       Besides, if anyone were to put it into a large community, no harm
>>>       would be done other than what would happen if any other unassigned
>>>       ASN were used.
>>>
>>>       About reserving values, we don't reserve values because the values
>>>       are unusable, but because we may want to use them for other purposes
>>>       later. There is no need to reserve another value. 3 is more than
>>>       enough.
>>>
>>> 	Thanks,
>>> 	Jakob.
>>> --------------
>>>
>>    WFM, but please get your chairs to chase down why the message didn't
>> make it to the archive.
> It shows up in the other archive:
> https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/current/msg17255.html
There was an issue (for about 200 messages) in the indexing in the 
mailarchive tool that has been repaired.
This particular message is at
<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/tg_gVjNwrFWklo4dTRUHo7Rkqos>

Thanks again for spotting the issue.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Jakob.