[Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Fri, 25 March 2016 14:56 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2AC12D665 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 07:56:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.739
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.739 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RDNS_NONE=0.793] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZnetjkIwZmLd for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 07:56:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (unknown [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 126DB12D1D7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 25 Mar 2016 07:47:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=loggedin (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=74.43.47.77;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 10:47:14 -0400
Message-ID: <000401d186a5$38fac760$aaf05620$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01D18683.B1EAAE00"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdGGpJY5wzIcQ0EdQtuQOi1AWSw1Wg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/nNNu6bEIg-HLEUoVTn1_0-YJvjQ>
Subject: [Idr] WG Adoption call for drafts for Flow Specification option 1 (RFC5575 additions (filters/actions) 3/25 to 4/8/2016
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 14:56:10 -0000

IDR WG: 

 

This begins a 2 week WG Call (3/25 to 4/8/2016) for the set of drafts to be
considered in RFC5575 additions. These options are filters, actions or
critical security additions.  The flow specification work has been a part of
the interims since IETF 94

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/02/08/idr/proceedings.html

https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/interim/2016/03/07/idr/proceedings.html

 

There will be a brief flow specification presentation at IETF 95, and the
email list has select to start with option 1 - extending RFC5575.  We also
will be gathering details on the SDN/NFV use case for option 2 (new NLRI and
Wide Communities support). 

 

This is a group call for the drafts to be considered in the flow
specification work.  For each of the drafts you wish to be considered Option
1, please indicate: 

 

1)      If this option is valuable for the DDoS deployments or another
critical deployments,  

2)      Do you feel this draft is useful, but not ready for adoption, 

3)      Do you feel this draft is a good start for this work. 

 

The drafts to consider are: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-eddy-idr-flowspec-packet-rate/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-nvo3/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hao-idr-flowspec-redirect-tunnel/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-redirect-generalized-
sid/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-idr-bgp-flowspec-label/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-litkowski-idr-flowspec-interfaceset/

 
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-flowspec-redirect-generalized
-sid/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vandevelde-idr-flowspec-path-redirect
/

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-yong-idr-flowspec-mpls-match/

 

And for the ordering of these filters and actions drafts - the Option 1
section out of this 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hares-idr-flowspec-combo/

(A revised draft with just Option 1 will be posted) 

 

Sue Hares and John Scudder