IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)

"Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com> Mon, 07 November 2016 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <jheitz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5603912946F for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 08:14:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.017
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x0KWwYikgWWL for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 08:14:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1739E1293EB for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 08:14:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1846; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1478535273; x=1479744873; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=KuqJNKmVGt4unu1fDBeIG8EP2wwALTvoj8glSoCi3NM=; b=YaMasqE+JDbF1JKo74RUxBR/DvlPHal7SQsTlyGiqDXcqduyyfx64y1a xIFxVLh0pGVaMKe6iDxzyE0sFBZUuxLw5kXigJmH34YnwWevngbuxa1+W 4rdLg271HMZO2n0f+3udTdRyW5llH+XNXHl9ZLaQZMLbYt70p1aLYFVcH w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DmAQBspyBY/49dJa1dGwEBAQMBAQEJAQEBgy4BAQEBAR9YfIQriQ2mOYUagggphXsCggk/FAECAQEBAQEBAWIohGIBAQR5EAIBCAQBOgcyFBECBA4FFIhEDrQMi0ABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEchj6BfYJYh3iCLwWUR4VgAZBDkBCNKoQFAR43eoUqcgGHSQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,606,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="343494868"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 07 Nov 2016 16:14:33 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA7GEXxe021826 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 7 Nov 2016 16:14:33 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:14:32 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com ([173.36.7.24]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 10:14:32 -0600
From: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)
Thread-Index: AQHSN546iba0WaPSYk6woE67Sz8aq6DLBUg9gAHyDwCAAAWrgIAA2NyAgAABpQD//91M+g==
Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 16:14:32 +0000
Message-ID: <B245D36A-DB4D-402E-87ED-3DBF31699B2B@cisco.com>
References: <CAH1iCiq6jNtnkta0Bt952EQ9zOKSGt=_cCySsT5XuOKuHYO2nQ@mail.gmail.com> <86860386-9C2B-4BD5-B457-2A6DA5446CF3@cisco.com> <17E646EF-4633-423B-9AC4-B53D49C90632@gmail.com> <CA+b+ERk8NgT4RB9Hv_yrPRb2Gv2RVU9EjXUpdMc=mg0U7TeykQ@mail.gmail.com> <20161107121251.GT79185@Space.Net>, <CA+b+ER=8U7kww=8KpOjSDh=XpK+O2LVmStLDf4KuG+FGjp3-UQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=8U7kww=8KpOjSDh=XpK+O2LVmStLDf4KuG+FGjp3-UQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B245D36ADB4D402E87ED3DBF31699B2Bciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/nRmu3Z6W5hp9-jQRu1fYWOhx0nA>
Cc: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Vendor Defaults (was Re: Review of draft-ietf-large-community-06.txt)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 16:14:36 -0000

On Nov 7, 2016, at 4:19 AM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net<mailto:robert@raszuk.net>> wrote:

And if someone is inserting 5539:* it seems obvious that the intention is that such community should get to 5539.

Not always true.

5539:100 is used by 5539 to tell its neighbors that the route was learned in Frankfurt/DECIX.
http://www.space.net/static/bgp_communities.html

Thanks,
Jakob.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email