Re: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts

[Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

Thanks Acee!

To comply with IDR chairs request we have removed all "suggested" code points (see updated drafts).

Regards,
Jeff

> On Aug 5, 2017, at 10:48, Acee Lindem (acee) <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Hi Ketan, 
> When I spoke to Jeff in Prague, he was not attached to the specific code point, his main concern was getting early allocation for deployments requiring MSD advertisement. So, I think we are aligned. 
> Thanks,
> Acee 
> 
> From: Idr <[e-mail]> on behalf of "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <[e-mail]>
> Date: Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 1:23 AM
> To: Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]>, Job Snijders <[e-mail]>, John Scudder <[e-mail]>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[e-mail]>
> Cc: "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, IDR List <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, Stefano Previdi <[e-mail]>, Susan Hares <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts
> 
> Hi All,
>  
> The IANA early allocation has been done for the BGP-LS SR extension drafts now, but the other two drafts related to MSD and draft-idr-te-pm are still pending early allocations. May I request the authors to please request for the same at the earliest?
>  
> We have a collision right now between these drafts with their previously “suggested” code point values so would appreciate if this was resolved ASAP to aid implementations.
>  
> For the record, the previously suggested values were:
>  
>       TLV Type                   Value
>    --------------------------------------------------------
>     1104 (Suggested)  Unidirectional Link Delay
>  
>     1105 (Suggested)  Min/Max Unidirectional Link Delay
>  
>     1106 (Suggested)  Unidirectional Delay Variation
>  
>     1107 (Suggested)  Unidirectional Packet Loss
>  
>     1108 (Suggested)  Unidirectional Residual Bandwidth
>  
>     1109 (Suggested)  Unidirectional Available Bandwidth
>  
>     1110 (Suggested)  Unidirectional Bandwidth Utilization
>  
> Then from the MSD draft, we have collision
>  
>    Code-point: 1110 (Suggested value - to be assigned by IANA) from BGP-
>    LS Node Descriptor, Link Descriptor, Prefix Descriptor, and Attribute
>    TLVs registry
>  
> Thanks,
> Ketan
>  
> From: Jeff Tantsura [mailto:[e-mail]] 
> Sent: 15 July 2017 19:48
> To: Job Snijders <[e-mail]>; John G. Scudder <[e-mail]>; Ketan Talaulikar (ketant) <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Stefano Previdi <[e-mail]>; Susan Hares <[e-mail]>; [e-mail]; [e-mail]; idr wg <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts
>  
> That’s the plan!
>  
> Cheers,
> Jeff
>  
>  
> From: Job Snijders <[e-mail]>
> Date: Saturday, July 15, 2017 at 16:15
> To: Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]>, "John G. Scudder" <[e-mail]>, "Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)" <[e-mail]>
> Cc: Stefano Previdi <[e-mail]>, Susan Hares <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, "[e-mail]" <[e-mail]>, idr wg <[e-mail]>
> Subject: Re: [Idr] Regd BGP-LS code points early allocation for WG adopted drafts
>  
>  
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2017 at 15:35, Jeff Tantsura <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Would  you want the authors of draft-tantsura-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-msd  to remove suggested values or wait for early allocation and replace?
>  
>  
> The outcome of the IANA Early Allocation process is not directly connected to self-assigning (squatting) in the current document. I would suggest the squatted codepoint should be removed at the earliest opportunity (Monday morning). Uploading new drafts is cheap and easy after all. 
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> Job