IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-persistence-00:SecurityConsiderations

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Thu, 03 November 2011 14:21 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B71C11E80C2 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 07:21:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.992
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.992 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.257, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gJWKq4CdAWNX for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 07:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.16]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B6711E80AF for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 07:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C115858006; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 15:31:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail2.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 041D5858002; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 15:31:35 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 3 Nov 2011 15:21:31 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 15:21:31 +0100
Message-ID: <FE8F6A65A433A744964C65B6EDFDC240029522F7@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <4EB28AFF.9060706@raszuk.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-persistence-00:SecurityConsiderations
Thread-Index: AcyaJWI3p7MjZwzHSGG1vj/N6DL0sAADfjMg
References: <14153.1320288579@erosen-linux> <4EB22F4F.9080604@raszuk.net><FE8F6A65A433A744964C65B6EDFDC24002952075@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <4EB28AFF.9060706@raszuk.net>
From: bruno.decraene@orange.com
To: robert@raszuk.net
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Nov 2011 14:21:31.0933 (UTC) FILETIME=[E26744D0:01CC9A33]
Cc: idr@ietf.org, erosen@cisco.com, ju1738@att.com
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-uttaro-idr-bgp-persistence-00:SecurityConsiderations
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 14:21:33 -0000

>> If it's only
>> a BGP restart on PE2 (everything else working fine) I assume PE2
should
>> try to reuse the same label for the same route.
>
>I don't think so. Usually BGP asks for label block from label manager
>and allocates labels as seems fit.
>
>Only when a router would support RFC4781 which is BGP GR with labels
>that may not be the case.
>
>So are you saying that persistence draft now requires support of
enabled
>RFC4781 as prerequisite ?

No, this is not required.
But I have the impression that the possible use of RFC 4781 should be
discussed as part of the security section of the draft.

Cheers,
Bruno

>Cheers,
>R.
>_______________________________________________
>Idr mailing list
>Idr@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email