IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WG adoption for draft-haas-flowspec-capability-bits - 3/30 to 4/13

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Fri, 09 April 2021 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@slice.pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A946E3A255D for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 08:45:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x1k-NnfQFY0S for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 08:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E473A2559 for <idr@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 08:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0CC651E459; Fri, 9 Apr 2021 12:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 12:08:05 -0400
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>, "Aseem Choudhary (asechoud)" <asechoud=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20210409160805.GE29502@pfrc.org>
References: <CAOj+MMGukAL-fNpWh1yu=AHqnONPq9mCqqFGjK5pspFkHfn0UA@mail.gmail.com> <20210408104259.GH7355@pfrc.org> <BYAPR11MB3207F949DD2C8ECA0465CD1EC0739@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CABNhwV1fxAXHjy7=bc5QGWi0Jt89330U93tp8Hs0wvj3wdy6og@mail.gmail.com> <8B262FE8-EEFB-44E4-8AD0-2EBD3348DEF2@cisco.com> <005b01d72cf3$4f39c4a0$edad4de0$@tsinghua.org.cn> <BYAPR11MB32077D9D69646B7181F72182C0739@BYAPR11MB3207.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMHi5kkze8HbBf8yL8E8zomaBzcPz1ciER8_JeB8h9VVsw@mail.gmail.com> <20210409154518.GC29502@pfrc.org> <CAOj+MMHzqVQnEnhxpY8UO_Xyv3GaQHmJz0-QAVLFNfi7NEeoHw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHzqVQnEnhxpY8UO_Xyv3GaQHmJz0-QAVLFNfi7NEeoHw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/pHNTXnJx4NrHv7vZ8NcmAWeVOU4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG adoption for draft-haas-flowspec-capability-bits - 3/30 to 4/13
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2021 15:45:40 -0000

Robert,

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:34:54PM +0200, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> IDR WG and AD made a decision many months back that no new features you may
> be referring to sitting in your backlog will be added to flowspec v1. Did
> you miss that - I think so based on your replies.

Considering that the recommendation was based in part on my commentary on
the work for RFC 8955 and the problems with incremental deployment of new
features... why yes, I'm familiar with the motivations for the current
status quo.

The motivation for this draft is to see if we have a way forward in the
interim.

> > The point of the proposal is to offer an option that addresses incremental
> > deployment of new flowspec features without requiring a flowspec v2.
> 
> And that is the key src of my objection as I see what is being cooked here.
> It is against already reached WG consensus. New features should go to FSv2
> leaving FSv1 to do its original job.

I'd request you go back to Sue's simple 3 question adoption request and just
answer the questions there.

Thanks.

-- Jeff

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status