IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-04

Martin Bacher <mb.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 06 October 2017 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <mb.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8F6134C98; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:28:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.033
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.033 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ryysfuhGAZR; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-01.sil.at (smtp-01-5.sil.at [78.142.186.29]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30D1E132EA7; Fri, 6 Oct 2017 13:28:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [46.125.249.72] (helo=[192.168.22.9]) by smtp-01.sil.at with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <mb.ietf@gmail.com>) id 1e0ZEg-0006Nz-Of; Fri, 06 Oct 2017 22:28:42 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Martin Bacher <mb.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ERnUc4Qav_HaiunXwsnhhTU+biRAtujVUPSg6tcZUj1AYQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 22:28:25 +0200
Cc: Martin Bacher <mb.ietf@gmail.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <8FB7FDEE-16B5-4D43-B6D1-FA8BF347D1BF@gmail.com>
References: <00A83D9A-C00E-4A91-8007-421067DCE879@juniper.net> <CA+b+ERnUc4Qav_HaiunXwsnhhTU+biRAtujVUPSg6tcZUj1AYQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-H-Notify: Remote host 46.125.249.72 incorrectly presented itself as [192.168.22.9]
X-Scan-Signature: 63fb4d616f6de0b67668222d3dea4bb5
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/pewrpxci80CjXUBg7R076_fwJdQ>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WGLC for draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-04
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2017 20:28:48 -0000

I am also not aware about any IPR associated with draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-04.

Martin


> Am 06.10.2017 um 20:24 schrieb Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>:
> 
> I am not aware about any IPR associated with draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-04.
> 
> Thx
> Robert Raszuk.
> 
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 7:39 PM, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> A working group last call has been requested for draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-04. Please reply to the list with your comments. As usual note we cannot advance the draft without participation from the group. Please get your comments in before October 20, 2017.
> 
> Authors, please confirm that any relevant IPR has been disclosed.
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-04
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> --John
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email