[Idr] Upcoming WG Adoptions and code points.

"Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 11 April 2019 13:23 UTC

Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9C921202CA for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:23:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.946
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.946 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qX67nGQqrCMS for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-100-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E1E91202BF for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2019 06:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=166.176.248.72;
From: "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:23:23 -0400
Message-ID: <020d01d4f069$bdc825b0$39587110$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_020E_01D4F048.36BC5210"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdTwaXh/UsmEl3s9RL2CWMD2P28cvQ==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190411-0, 04/11/2019), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/phd3l3lPRTl2S3mxHRud540dUGo>
Subject: [Idr] Upcoming WG Adoptions and code points.
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 13:23:36 -0000

Greetings idr - 

 

IETF 104  was extremely productive.   Based on the two pieces of work
(RFC7752bis and Extended messages passing WG LC), we are going forward with
WG adoptions related to LS additions. 

 

1)      draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr

2)      draft-li-idr-bgpls-ls-sbfd-extensions

3)      draft-ketant-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo

4)      draft-wu-idr-bgp-segment-allocation-ext

 

Please let me know if you have another BGP-ls related draft I should add to
the list. 

 

I will begin IPR calls for all four drafts.  The draft which completes all
of its IPR calls first will start the adoption process. 

 

In addition, I will be sending an early code point allocation for 2 Flow
specification drafts.  

draft-ietf-idr-nvo3-flowspec-04 and draft-ietf-idr-l2vpn-09. 

 

Please note the shepherd write-up is being completed for the following
drafts with implementations:  

1)      draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages-30 [Sue Hares shepherd]

2)      draft-idr-bgp-bestpath-selection-criteria [Sue Hares shepherd]

3)      draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-2.txt  [Jie Dong shepherd]

 

If you have any final comments, please send implementation reports and
comments to the shepherd. 

 

The following drafts are undergoing active shepherd engagement

1)      draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-11  [John Scudder]

2)      draft-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection [John Scudder] 

 

Cheerily, Susan Hares