Return-Path: X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73641200F1; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:07:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.2 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJAFwKCCsXFT; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7286812002E; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 06:07:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 5D89532DB829362D01A2; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:07:53 +0100 (IST) Received: from lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) by lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:07:52 +0100 Received: from lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) by lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:07:52 +0100 Received: from DGGEMM403-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.211) by lhreml704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.53) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:07:52 +0100 Received: from DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.237]) by DGGEMM403-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.211]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:07:45 +0800 From: Lizhenbin To: Susan Hares , "idr@ietf.org" CC: "draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment@ietf.org" Thread-Topic: [Idr] draft-ietf-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - IPR poll prior to adoption [8/15 - 8/29] Thread-Index: AQHVVAlWc3w73CVcUUmJLAeUh/PDFKcudyuA Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:07:45 +0000 Message-ID: <5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D934AFC57@DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com> References: <020c01d5537e$50f42560$f2dc7020$@ndzh.com> <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927CD03DF92@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> In-Reply-To: <76CD132C3ADEF848BD84D028D243C927CD03DF92@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: zh-CN X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.111.206.84] Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D934AFC57DGGEMM532MBXchi_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Archived-At: Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - IPR poll prior to adoption [8/15 - 8/29] X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:07:58 -0000 --_000_5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D934AFC57DGGEMM532MBXchi_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm not aware of any IPR related to this draft. Best regards, Zhenbin (Robin) From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@ndzh.com] Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 11:30 PM To: idr@ietf.org Cc: draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment@ietf.org Subject: draft-ietf-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - IPR poll prior t= o adoption [8/15 - 8/29] This begins an IPR poll for draft-ietf-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt= . The authors should indicate whether they know of any IPR. The authors have requested WG adoption because for BGP[2] and BGP-LS[3] extensions for Path Segment, since the SR-MPLS Path Segment[1] has been adopted in SPRING[1], and the contents are mature in these drafts. Sue -------------- [1]. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00 [2]. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01 [3]. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment= -03 --_000_5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D934AFC57DGGEMM532MBXchi_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I’m not aware of any IPR related to this draft.<= /span>

 

Best regards,

Zhenbin (Robin)

 

 

 

From: Susan Hares [mailto:shares@n= dzh.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2019 11:30 PM
To: idr@ietf.org
Cc: = draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment@ietf.org
Subject: draft-ietf-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt - IPR poll = prior to adoption [8/15 - 8/29]

 

This begins an IPR poll for dra= ft-ietf-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01.txt.

The authors should indicate whe= ther they know of any IPR.

 

The authors have requested WG a= doption because for  BGP[2] and BGP-LS[3]

extensions for Path Segment, &n= bsp;since the SR-MPLS Path Segment[1]

has been adopted in SPRING[1], = and the contents are mature in these drafts.

 

Sue

 

--------------

 

[1]. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-spring-mpls-path-segment-00=

[2]. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-segment-01=

[3]. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-li-idr-bgp-ls-sr-policy-path-segment-03

 

--_000_5A5B4DE12C0DAC44AF501CD9A2B01A8D934AFC57DGGEMM532MBXchi_--