[Idr] Re: Adoption call for IANA Registrations for the BGP Finite State Machine (FSM) (ending 31 May, 2024)

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Sat, 25 May 2024 18:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4140DC14F5EC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2024 11:43:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d-z7incchzrn for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 May 2024 11:43:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F4085C14F5E6 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 May 2024 11:43:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (172-125-100-52.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [172.125.100.52]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E6D951E039; Sat, 25 May 2024 14:43:12 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_28A61448-EF05-4CC1-B1B2-E55E181528EA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.8\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <AM0PR07MB41316B5359916DD53ED9BC3CA0F62@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 25 May 2024 14:43:12 -0400
Message-Id: <DCB98414-9A29-4943-AFCB-0A736379E514@pfrc.org>
References: <20240524143725.GA24975@pfrc.org> <AM0PR07MB41316B5359916DD53ED9BC3CA0F62@AM0PR07MB4131.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
To: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.8)
Message-ID-Hash: NV3ASBL74ICURHRHQW3ICQ32WZ4DKX4T
X-Message-ID-Hash: NV3ASBL74ICURHRHQW3ICQ32WZ4DKX4T
X-MailFrom: jhaas@pfrc.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: Adoption call for IANA Registrations for the BGP Finite State Machine (FSM) (ending 31 May, 2024)
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/pySwrOMypekwEcC0Cm1kVzjK15o>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>

Tom,

Tracking edits toward -02 or adoption:
https://github.com/ietf-wg-idr/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fsm-iana/pull/4 <https://github.com/ietf-wg-idr/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-fsm-iana/pull/4>



> On May 25, 2024, at 5:44 AM, tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> wrote:
> 
> I may go through all the names to see if they are exactly the same as in the RFC but may not have time to in the next five days.  They look ok at first reading.
> 
> This thought is triggered by 
> 1- the Abstract
> which contains a [reference]

In diff.

> and which uses 'this draft'

s/draft/document/

> and seems inconsistent as to 'Finite State Machine' or 'finite state machine' - I think that the former is better.

The capitalized version is used in section headers and registry names.


> All of which suggests that some editing may be needed.

And certainly aside from list feedback, feel free to open issues or submit pull requests to the github repository.

-- Jeff