Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-02.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 14 March 2017 12:54 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3181293E0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:54:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.349
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.349 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bYz47rW476uV for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22a.google.com (mail-qt0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4CA7128874 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id i34so54535074qtc.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=FRxv86E/w7OQp1gskN7rPMI6yzx7V9yVNWvaVAbRjXE=; b=r+ToAq0O3MMqx/87VW0Ofk7CZs1lQk4zw4Bt//xYb+HQAb3ilzYtmbi1UU6NfsEeMj i+fNTCzTr76Fp/lX04FjfP1yn6Vw2vXQ8nU1ylseqHeaULn9DHokP8RBt3UEsgZMOA+n Dr5WIqi0XV58r1dOKFODXjlzC1JghWX0i0CXo8M+hrmtFRNbBCz/iaUL2QW6+rOG9Lng 0DuIjGKEMpSpS4LqLhbUB1qz/NVPx8coRKgC9EaT2cVgrWgkc94APDhTDO3B7w4KnX7H nGDbV4SfURxH9b3mZhi8HLtMuNyoAZtORzmNMX6Q9xq4t/yDzZqjG6PbeW1BL8WKdTwY 7HrQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FRxv86E/w7OQp1gskN7rPMI6yzx7V9yVNWvaVAbRjXE=; b=HWXi6lqHNGyj88j5PD+3yM6bs2rswJj5AT/4YQVTRPyNTXvXVPLJd972PFvj9TGLvZ LYN2ikxS70uM+UREXfStyhEtbKTQvZXPJu9DnejadmRdxnAZz1Ssa6MpxxMTM+JevyVC 8iNoIDE950OWQcHNC/RzRYo5AhoZ4VG1KJp75kwBey2L3lSxnvNRjSSwyh4b5P4hpdYb b42FHWqjzrlSzgPyaqSJKxyUN0VD1M2hY8l4oSbnpED1cVAhPBrkd97U9sGbEXM3aoea boMRbht/S96qxnCzW3VBJKU5g+UNZuY1HpwKdDwxR2P+7YYoFGT9t1Lrlpw9rd4MK8Z2 xOjQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39l9yKhd7ouwG96VNRmsegnwXOzRd6Uz72MTlN55HAhzk9qyUwdtfsu8QPoPopgn6vy5qzysEzDj0kXF9g==
X-Received: by 10.200.2.150 with SMTP id p22mr40089034qtg.197.1489496040862; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.42.181 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 05:54:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170314113203.GI2367@Space.Net>
References: <148924277112.2960.17904473852401253352@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2k27tzs5k.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERmmqtUkJMtfOE9ABFHN0gNdztjOGELmirNgWRnDENrjaA@mail.gmail.com> <m2zigpxu7o.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ER=MaOqOr0A9VZ3TfgbSWgjk3eGwLKmnfr=byvOs11Ppfg@mail.gmail.com> <m2o9x4whh2.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERnTJ4TJtgp=Jnn7k08j4dPibhB4gC69WWyQ4wDbxxr5zA@mail.gmail.com> <m260jcw5gg.wl-randy@psg.com> <CA+b+ERn5XT=SFCj+tTegASRq9PTEONH3kkpvkvRsQ3mX4_cYCQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170314113203.GI2367@Space.Net>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:54:00 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: mhf9JYKKJXIL12Xm-_1W1S9_Q6A
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERmQRgV+izw4vZ8-aTyRA8RD7idvREqMudZ7_vj+5u7bAg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f4030435c234693803054ab052ea
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/q3jPWGxpx411Myb_KXC3QuqBcgU>
Cc: Interminable Discussion Room <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 12:54:04 -0000

‚Äč> Please enlighten yourself what people use "as peering router" today :-)

Care to enlighten me on or offline ? Which BGP stacks can not handle full
table ?


... and about the amount of prefixes you can receive on a reasonably-sized
> IXP.
>


AMS-IX ... 160K v4 prefixes ..
Ref: https://ams-ix.net/technical/statistics/route-server-stats

LINX (all combined RSes) - 120K v4 prefixes
https://stats.linx.net/rs/

JPIX - 20K v4 routes ... avrage grow 4K per year
https://www.slideshare.net/apnic/the-trend-stats-of-routing-table-at-jpix-route-servers


Is this overwhelming ? Please notice that not all of them would churn on a
daily basis too so your weak edge may choke only upon initial dump. No
public data on how many paths each of those nets have.

R.