Re: [Idr] Early allocation for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification

"Susan Hares" <> Tue, 21 March 2017 17:04 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3704C1286B1; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.947
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fJ2RwXkXkuTA; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9289D1294BF; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 10:04:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=;
From: "Susan Hares" <>
To: "'John G. Scudder'" <>, "'Job Snijders'" <>
Cc: "'Jakob Heitz \(jheitz\)'" <>, <>, <>
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:59:03 -0400
Message-ID: <036601d2a264$723bd9c0$56b38d40$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0367_01D2A242.EB2BE770"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQJNtEkTgzlTKZaIcQptCFnf9VYXegKMmzFfAqlI3D+gf7Dy4A==
Content-Language: en-us
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Early allocation for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 17:04:15 -0000



Will you revise the draft prior to early allocation call to remove this code


Sue Hares

(co-chair hat) 


From: John G. Scudder [] 
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 3:46 PM
To: Job Snijders
Cc: Jakob Heitz (jheitz);;
Subject: Re: [Idr] Early allocation for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-gr-notification


On Mar 18, 2017, at 6:53 AM, Job Snijders <> wrote:

Given the 50+ years of combined IETF experience the authors of this draft
possess, I'm somewhat surprised to see a suggested value in the IANA
considerations instead of "TBD". See the last major bullet point here:


Considering my name's in the list at the top of the draft, and that I wrote
the bullet point in question, that's on me. This is what you should not do.


If someone brings a dunce cap for me to wear during the chair's portion of
the meeting, I will.