Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext

"Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)" <> Tue, 01 November 2016 03:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E0512967D for <>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:36:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.017
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.017 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPbSxuQR3hLP for <>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF60C129849 for <>; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 20:36:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=4320; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1477971390; x=1479180990; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=PAen3XFVBusHEIx+esn879dPaSM9FpfeHOo8aD3JpnM=; b=lOLdf/nLr5+uCJrR3WrO7JBFR5IBZkVCjxLdZA+zs0veF0LMp2uPsCjd FpF9sUjC7w7qFMMxwRFnmn6KS4TrfD9WmXwlwXNHuHh71gjlVJXjzManj pYub1RXKtwwM3cWdNgyuJ2lIQpHx33qPJ3pguQq78fNY/qAWqj+g+TO9D o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,430,1473120000"; d="scan'208,217";a="341139741"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Nov 2016 03:36:29 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uA13aTLG018938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 03:36:29 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:36:29 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 31 Oct 2016 22:36:29 -0500
From: "Bertrand Duvivier (bduvivie)" <>
To: Pushpasis Sarkar <>, "John G. Scudder" <>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext
Thread-Index: AQHSM7wVahW/27Di2E2hlIydCAHajqDDxz8AgAAHWgA=
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 03:36:29 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D43DCB8A6479Bbduvivieciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 03:36:32 -0000

Support as Product Manager for Cisco, implementation completed and shipping on 2 Cisco operating systems: IOS-XR (SP routing) and IOS classic (Enterprise routing).
Best Regards Bertrand Duvivier

On Tuesday, 1 November 2016, John G. Scudder <<>> wrote:
Hi Everyone,

The authors have asked (some time ago actually) for the WG to adopt draft-gredler-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext.

If you support or oppose adoption please reply indicating so. Reasons for your position are helpful, as volunteering to review, comment, and/or shepherd.

The adoption call will end November 13.





   Segment Routing (SR) allows for a flexible definition of end-to-end
   paths within IGP topologies by encoding paths as sequences of
   topological sub-paths, called "segments".  These segments are
   advertised by the link-state routing protocols (IS-IS, OSPF and

   This draft defines extensions to the BGP Link-state address-family in
   order to carry segment information via BGP.
Idr mailing list<javascript:;>