Re: [Idr] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-11: (with COMMENT)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 14 June 2016 04:26 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AE312DB1A for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:26:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.4
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.198, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xuvPJVmNk9Ir for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:25:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A965E12D195 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id q132so58658259lfe.3 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:25:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=i4RdyKHOv6NkNFEv2WHk1eQXs5DhzkUQjyxp6e50v+4=; b=TkvZyIC2sJYNX5NBLbuaHr5nBu+xq9+ffUqreErTEIDufVF92Zus7vKGO3iyJpcaFb F3fTI+5Ihb9joT7uEa9fNHEiF7koK6sKUDJ7wckk2Y6ZDdp6zKjrP1PgNACUT6eqD3sI 2j4SBxeKdtuTfcKv4Tpp0mDWkuvJGLQVdGaB2qX9QzcQOQbYMmig7fP53u8GevVT9Xs0 DlansfZUWrkUTmTaM5SGfGqaTaBGbRSEryeltp0w+I4ZQ9TfMoSjwLeoKWSFMJ8B2LWr w74VYQ0hTzGLpvyPVy/lZHSSi384Hw5QRsK/KlHcGB7nlfr15OzTUcbZzCREIWg0WY2L zgqw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=i4RdyKHOv6NkNFEv2WHk1eQXs5DhzkUQjyxp6e50v+4=; b=lEhy1mNrVSLNWMDOse4x518U2gzvsP/rfUKSmMh/nQLVgN13F/6p1q2xtE9uCs83tm DgX6Ytps2SbzDiDZuVVHpry5udXcZ+BnNWfoArqVsOUtjK4d7Vmp1tuCGtim1IxuEtRg Hy03lvbncTIxexoIS6omq3jP00njOoumRQT0M/lZ4xyl0lyYYeJtRrYvbhT/Xq29F+ef FKPvZv06OcFDRcX6yMZ95zJuZlACDklQOCrfDaSjj7CmJM8H6Ui63/5vdjYnepw2JVNf ZMI1dT790Fv9lX5MizPKnnOjD8aJmNdwJthOXCbhGe0iP8lSbvpQMPwkvwCedS5pLo7A nzPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLQLu/M0UZTCeoCZyzikvCRGqT999LRP4sd4npjZd+7IGdiFGSyv4y8Bs5G4p7Sjs2V+4y0ASJtpU3LrA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.84.65 with SMTP id i62mr1216955lfb.88.1465878356725; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.25.21.30 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.21.30 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:25:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m2lh28mnvw.wl%randy@psg.com>
References: <20160613132809.12486.44511.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <575EB839.3050303@foobar.org> <0DE7AB8E-4CFD-44C5-898F-47F48B542599@kuehlewind.net> <575F2704.3050509@foobar.org> <m237ogo5w1.wl%randy@psg.com> <CAL9jLaaCa9aUOw0HUfyrt05GTYL+yGZum1M=3_4r_E0nx4PqJg@mail.gmail.com> <A65A6088-433D-4200-B098-B2FFEB0A45CD@psg.com> <CAL9jLabgF=h9wSg4GoDoJiT76HcKK2DhpJv=ZxLws7LSs8RN3g@mail.gmail.com> <m2shwgmpg5.wl%randy@psg.com> <m2lh28mnvw.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 06:25:56 +0200
X-Google-Sender-Auth: oDU15yP9xpOXeGRAWcnsm1U1PJw
Message-ID: <CA+b+ER=MqxoTecTV4wRdm6zvr-d6A66FtsVAUHVb=26-w2iSWw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11411f28bc99b005353566f0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/qdDHphVSEShw8k_wEyp7__nTPb4>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-ie?= =?utf-8?q?tf-idr-ix-bgp-route-server-11=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 04:26:00 -0000

Let's observe that nothing prevents such "one" to extend it's inbound
AS_PATH for nets he learns from RS with additional AS to make it less
preffered ... without any special action to be taken by RS itself.

Thx
R.
On Jun 13, 2016 23:48, "Randy Bush" <randy@psg.com>; wrote:

> > i think what might be said is "creating an undesirably longer AS_PATH"
> > and thus biasing receivers against using the exchange.
>
> my bad (trans-pac and not enough coffee).  we're discussing the
> opposite, why one might want the RS to have an AS in my path.  well, to
> me it would be because i have one a path directly from peer and one via
> the RS.  i would prefer the former.  see draft-ietf-idr-rs-bfd-01.txt
> for why i kinda like to know layer two is up.
>
> randy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
>