Re: [Idr] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-23: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 24 April 2020 17:43 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582943A10B8; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 10:43:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fvcmig7ydbQK; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 10:43:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C6C43A1080; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id i10so11902488wrv.10; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 10:43:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YPM6RIVZO+5U9KxahdoUSE5Gtb4w2X8mO7s+7Jlw+l0=; b=QZIN0FXSZ82pcqT6/A59hw/FD0Syd/+GQ1AnfFZCyhgatcz6ben7znD7e/g7s+GTmT xywVDy+zLEiQ+JD44osh42sTUk7TipjR2wb4D3OrbudB08efMLfVxO7Jhueojpjo4ZRZ lFESaH0H6vF30LvT8rRl7DjJjEKE0HPTABEmqi7jsRRcMDaXqZvRem4fyYRKRNf+xLIy DbNzGxp4kwwC6Z9aQIZpoQIXS+zKwDoEDivZLoKnB5aPoEkBKvhFHLqNoi/ifnWhv7IS 7h6CU/56/e2e8eVYa7doMmaEkAJmvyaxfIE6eFB9etmTGYGG1eONQf0k57BIIb7MREqH MIqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YPM6RIVZO+5U9KxahdoUSE5Gtb4w2X8mO7s+7Jlw+l0=; b=EPc4LjiBErH5/xle5s5aoNvCGRm25HZY1S2aglNZXipS5ExiikeKhBZDIuOEX+HXeY Lynvr/CRIK2gWU8KRmLtVr5qr9aB62Z6q2qNxCQnOyyO2KGzJZkxvJXeD8FZhIylgYsS Jr+DPb09IOPpqLfIZjxeiZwOP6U662Odxh6ITTduOk7IhxDg5Z/TqbrHeLzME2AxMguV suBwwX5eMup7bWnuPrvlb/VpVqFKdx18xa03baSz29M5DVnGELMsZVdoywbbb1ofnatZ tg0Ihc0DviYqTdeidDUw0TxcUu+q7tcfKX7xxYBO/xS/ay+l8R6V/WtTn96tfygWS7q0 OWuw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PublHjeBGcHC6n7nvGhltxKVN+TXjTOewsRmqtmJd7gp7X5DWoBu gYjOp1QCciIpRQI0yATtjZnQz4957f3cySCbNwU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJDZ94+iRBdBhCVbM01nVYltt0/Rrh1sW3n6NwinbE3zh8BqV/1lvfebEfoGMnUudDKDEqsA1nqLYLbhUqzylM=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:94a6:: with SMTP id 35mr12105785wrr.420.1587750203844; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 10:43:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 10:43:23 -0700
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1587749630_176333@FUMC-WEB2>
References: <1587749630_176333@FUMC-WEB2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 10:43:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMESsyxoNyPWEE5Wv=g=MivM7CTFwS78wfQAsJpOMBhf45jmg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com>, "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" <rwilton@cisco.com>
Cc: "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/qjOMKbLsGXzyFrZWzlkhfIYfk-k>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Robert Wilton's Discuss on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-23: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 17:43:33 -0000

On April 24, 2020 at 1:34:02 PM, Susan Hares wrote:


Sue:

Hi!


> The author team will change to MUST per your comments.
>
> I know there is nothing in the text and I know there were problems. Given the
> rush on the first version, I know things were down-played so the urgent
> problem could be fixed.
>
> My warning that the bit settings may be deep in code and current people may
> have trouble finding it.
>
> That said, it is the right thing to do.

Thanks!   I still want to give Jie a chance to poll the
implementations just in case -- this should not take more than a few
days.


> Did the iesg want by in same document?

Sorry...I couldn't parse that.

Thanks!

Alvaro.