[Idr] Re: IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)

Yisong Liu <liuyisong@chinamobile.com> Tue, 03 November 2020 03:54 UTC

Return-Path: <liuyisong@chinamobile.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADD143A13ED for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:54:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.329
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.329 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_EXCESS_BASE64=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aPmt6zO8cwZU for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:54:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cmccmta2.chinamobile.com (cmccmta2.chinamobile.com [221.176.66.80]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7C43A13EC for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:54:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.15]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app07-12007 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee75fa0d47db82-81f3d; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:54:37 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee75fa0d47db82-81f3d
X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0
X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000
Received: from CMCC-PC (unknown[223.69.130.224]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr08-12008 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee85fa0d47cc84-4d455; Tue, 03 Nov 2020 11:54:37 +0800 (CST)
X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee85fa0d47cc84-4d455
MIME-Version: 1.0
x-PcFlag: 8c8fcb6a-e834-496c-830a-c854af65e38a_5_24381
X-Mailer: PC_RICHMAIL 2.8.2
Date: 03 Nov 2020 11:54:37 +0800
From: =?utf-8?B?WWlzb25nIExpdQ==?=<liuyisong@chinamobile.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?U3VzYW4gSGFyZXM=?=<shares@ndzh.com>, idr<idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: 20201103115437168900837@chinamobile.com>
Content-Type: multipart/Alternative; boundary="----=_001_NextPart168900837_=----"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/qzExSaKcRF8KaoJnbS6hV4cqqlg>
Subject: [Idr] =?utf-8?q?Re=EF=BC=9A__IPR_Call_and_WG_Adoption_for_draft-?= =?utf-8?q?qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04=2Etxt_=2811/1/2020_to_11/16/2020=29?=
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 03:54:52 -0000


Hi 




I support the adoption of this draft.




Thanks

Yisong









 



发件人: Susan Hares

时间: 2020/11/02(星期一)13:57

收件人: idr;

主题: [Idr] IPR Call and WG Adoption for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/1/2020 to 11/16/2020)



This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04.txt (11/2/2020 to 11/16/2020). 

 

The draft can be accessed at: 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu/

 

The authors should provide IPR statements by 11/5/2020 so the IDR WG can consider the IPR status in their 

decision. 

 

This draft adds the IFIT sub-TLV to the BGP Tunnel Encaps attribute for the SR policy tunnel type. This sub-TLV is only valid for SR Policy tunnel types.  Within the IFIT  sub-TLV value field, 5 sub-TLVs may be included (4 for IOAM and 1 for Enhanced Alternate Marking).   

 

The IDR co-chairs thank the authors for their patience.  The WG adoption call for this draft has been delayed by the process of switching shepherds for BGP Tunnel Encaps draft.  Many BESS and IDR drafts currently refer to the BGP tunnel encapsulation drafts. 

 

In your review of this draft, please differentiate between the following: 

·         Support/rejection of In-situ Flow Telemetry (IFIT) as a IP routing technology,

·         Support/rejection of alternate marking as a IP routing technology,  

·         Support/rejection of adding new sub-TLVS for SR Policy tunnel type of BGP Tunnel Encap Attribute, and   

·         Specific issues with the descriptions of these features in the draft. 

 

Cheers, Susan Hares