Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]

Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> Mon, 04 November 2019 01:57 UTC

Return-Path: <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61655120020 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 17:57:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.631
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.631 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id r0epgYS34T8W for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 17:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7149C120881 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Nov 2019 17:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id A2C70EC007CFD0894F75 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 01:57:37 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM422-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.39) by lhreml709-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 01:57:37 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM532-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.7.231]) by dggemm422-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.198.39]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 09:56:55 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]
Thread-Index: AdWSeb/dqPJstGJnTOWfrEN2Z8GiNgAOWK0M
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 01:56:55 +0000
Message-ID: 12CB3745-65F8-4B53-B1AD-6151613B6869
References: <001101d5927a$09fe8c00$1dfba400$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <001101d5927a$09fe8c00$1dfba400$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_12CB374565F84B53B1AD6151613B6869_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/qzN27ZVjJmja9ywVezllkXj14jE>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 01:57:43 -0000

Support the adoption.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)




--------------------------------------------------
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745<tel:+86-13651017745>/+968-91797068<tel:+968-91797068>
Email: lizhenbin@huawei.com<mailto:lizhenbin@huawei.com>
发件人:Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>;
收件人:idr <idr@ietf.org>;
时 间:2019-11-04 03:08:57
主题[Idr] WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]

Greetings IDR:

The adoption call for  draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt  was inconclusive.
We had clear support, but just not enough response.
This lack of response was probably due to my errors in posting the
name of the draft (pardon my error Adrian) [Blush..]

To make this easier, the current draft is:

draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03/
which you can get at;

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry/

This draft proposes to refine the instructions for RFC7752
"Border Gateway Protocol – Link   State (BGP-LS) Parameters Registry"
from Designated Expert to  Expert Review.

These are both technical reviews prior to assignments of
code point or code points in the registry.
The only difference is instructions for the review.

Please read this draft and consider if the changes for the
BGP-LS review will speed up the BGP-LS parameter assignments.

John and I anticipate that expert reviews will allow code request for
BGP-LS quicker response to code requests.  We encourage the WG to
read and strongly consider this draft.

Cheers, Sue