Re: [Idr] WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]

[Lizhenbin <[e-mail]>]

Support the adoption.

Best Regards,
Zhenbin (Robin)




--------------------------------------------------
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: [phone]<tel:[phone]>/[phone]<tel:[phone]>
Email: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
发件人：Susan Hares <[e-mail]>
收件人：idr <[e-mail]>
时 间：2019-11-04 03:08:57
主题[Idr] WG Adoption call (2nd post) - draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03.txt [11/3 to 11/17/2019]

Greetings IDR:

The adoption call for  draft-farrell-idr-bgp-ls-registry-02.txt  was inconclusive.
We had clear support, but just not enough response.
This lack of response was probably due to my errors in posting the
name of the draft (pardon my error Adrian) [Blush..]

To make this easier, the current draft is:

draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry-03/
which you can get at;

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-farrel-idr-bgp-ls-registry/

This draft proposes to refine the instructions for RFC7752
"Border Gateway Protocol – Link   State (BGP-LS) Parameters Registry"
from Designated Expert to  Expert Review.

These are both technical reviews prior to assignments of
code point or code points in the registry.
The only difference is instructions for the review.

Please read this draft and consider if the changes for the
BGP-LS review will speed up the BGP-LS parameter assignments.

John and I anticipate that expert reviews will allow code request for
BGP-LS quicker response to code requests.  We encourage the WG to
read and strongly consider this draft.

Cheers, Sue