Re: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16)

Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com> Tue, 03 November 2020 08:19 UTC

Return-Path: <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC953A152C for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 00:19:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.332
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.332 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, INVALID_MSGID=0.568, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xjbu4apqnhMn for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 00:19:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D26B3A152E for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 00:19:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml750-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.106]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 57E8C89421A08C77F423 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:19:03 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from lhreml750-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.200) by lhreml750-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:19:03 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.214) by lhreml750-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.200) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:19:02 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM512-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.215]) by DGGEMM406-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.214]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Tue, 3 Nov 2020 16:18:59 +0800
From: Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16)
Thread-Index: AdawvMBaghCOE6fURXKxuh9t+EnUOwA/Tp5G
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 08:18:58 +0000
Message-ID: 9F536FC2-C420-485E-862B-B0E5CC95402B
References: <03d401d6b0be$96cde8c0$c469ba40$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <03d401d6b0be$96cde8c0$c469ba40$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9F536FC2C420485E862BB0E5CC95402B_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/rGQn848XiP9oEEgzD_zcpLt8N2U>
Subject: Re: [Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2020 08:19:07 -0000

Hi All,

I support the WG LC of the draft.


Best Regards,

Zhenbin (Robin)

--------------------------------------------------
李振斌 Li Zhenbin
Mobile: +86-13651017745<tel:+86-13651017745>/+968-91797068
Email: lizhenbin@huawei.com<mailto:lizhenbin@huawei.com>

发件人:Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
收件人:idr <idr@ietf.org>
时 间:2020-11-02 10:20:41
主 题:[Idr] IPR and WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt (11/1 to 11/16)

This begins a 2 week WG LC for  draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04.txt
(11/1 to 11/16).

The authors should send their IPR statements by Tuesday (11/3)
or this WG LC will be extended 1 extra week.

You can access the draft at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo/

This draft is also needed to match BGP work to LSR specification
for draft-ietf-lsr-flex-algo-13.txt (at IESG).

There are 2 Cisco implementations of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo.
Details on the implementations are at:
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo%20implementations

WG members should consider in their response:

a) Are there technical issues with the flexible algorithm technology?
b) Is this draft ready for publication?
c) Will this technology aid LSR deployments?
d) Are you concerned about the 2 implementations coming
only from Cisco?

If you know of any other planned implementations, please send
Chairs this information or respond to this email to inform the WG.

Cheers, Susan Hares