Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt (6/4 to 6/18)(.

Luuk Hendriks <luuk@nlnetlabs.nl> Thu, 18 June 2020 07:28 UTC

Return-Path: <luuk@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D5A3A0EE5 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id feJFGAufSg9z for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (dicht.nlnetlabs.nl [185.49.140.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29C1D3A0EE8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (waggle.xentower.nl [IPv6:2a02:898:210::29]) by dicht.nlnetlabs.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6332323B74; Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:28:31 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=nlnetlabs.nl
Authentication-Results: dicht.nlnetlabs.nl; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=luuk@nlnetlabs.nl
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=default; t=1592465311; bh=Tadaa0rp5KPoBDH2nQSKSNkX8HDjbSDNIOF3Dh0Ugps=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=DvnV0KKcB4sRzRi0QTipQyBZGQCLVclUZetmhG9IOt8krF7GFFupy44GEIj3AlfSc torX1KbrsIlHw+C6HqPB2bJ1A+uEWwQVxVChduZIMu/6h5XQw0XT7RqO32Ll+tJotS qPsC76bnYw/vwi0EZncK2Dzk71x7cqr48tPvql/k=
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:28:30 +0200
From: Luuk Hendriks <luuk@nlnetlabs.nl>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Cc: "'idr@ietf. org'" <idr@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20200618072830.GN23400@waggle.xentower.nl>
References: <005901d63ab5$d6003e00$8200ba00$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <005901d63ab5$d6003e00$8200ba00$@ndzh.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/rRVp6qCwzo7q9KVjGxukrRheiOE>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt (6/4 to 6/18)(.
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 07:28:35 -0000

Hi Susan, list,

Based upon reading -11:

> 1) Is this specification ready for publication? 

Yes, I think this document is ready for publication.
 

> 2) Are there deployments where this BGP protocol extension is valuable? 

I believe a vast majority of deployments will benefit from this simple
(i.e. elegant) but powerful extension, and therefore I fully support it.

 
> 3) Do you believe the error code handling is ready for publication? 

No opinion, I do not feel knowledgable/experienced enough to give a hard
yes/no here.


Small nit, Sec 6:
"The purpose of this attribute is to guarantee that once _a_ route"



 luuk


On Thu  4 Jun 2020, 17:19, Susan Hares wrote:
> This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-10.txt
> 
> >From 6/4 to 6/18/2020.  
> 
>  
> 
> There are 3 implementations:   BIRD (1.76, 2.05) , FRR, and Mikrotik. 
> 
> The BIRD and FRR implementations interoperate. 
> 
> I do not have details on Mikrotik.  
> 
>  
> 
> Details on the  interoperability are on the following IDR wiki page: 
> 
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy
> 
>  
> 
> Only one  error handling issues exists on the ability of BIRD 
> 
> to send Role Mismatch (Open Error (2), subcode 8).  
> 
> Another protocol was assigned to subcode 8.  
> 
>  
> 
> Please comment on the following questions: 
> 
> 1) Is this specification ready for publication? 
> 
> 2) Are there deployments where this BGP protocol extension is valuable? 
> 
> 3) Do you believe the error code handling is ready for publication? 
> 
>  
> 
> The shepherd for this draft is Susan Hares.  
> 
> During the WG LC, the shepherd's report will be sent. 
> 
>  
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 

> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr