IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 01 September 2022 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF786C14CE38 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 06:33:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHoE9UA4oVwA for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 06:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62a.google.com (mail-ej1-x62a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAD44C14F74E for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2022 06:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id cu2so34810535ejb.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 06:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=2pXdQ8Q+U8aq7KQ84Dk2kbYs6ZaGSfu/76CONw2g6h8=; b=Ys0Ih5dNOG5a7G2cKHQzBIrykAZWWl+B5hucip4m9BawLV9iJbPvVuhpMh6YSfdxAy yHXujfoIx6Xz9SCyRbq/n4ygKOoQvr6QCHmGFCmCLqN4hsdmzZcklFEM2wF0mtLKh/SD VbaIFqeaBABbTimb6yWrCQzBeREQ/lG9gkwpPYeTBdFroOEp+NiPLCz2+DZZ2Np2BFsh HhM3LMDSY2ymRds0LsaKn4H5tN8Qx2SX0aBpaKe0vZXB35a/zH/th3UNw8hPO/hr/+jN sz1UgZh4DZzLcU5W9F6ztIB+1dYICVaIBVF8qOihCd77UrE9R5jy5wYATrC2GTlCROAn GeLQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date; bh=2pXdQ8Q+U8aq7KQ84Dk2kbYs6ZaGSfu/76CONw2g6h8=; b=lmJuv1C1WBAQ5V79UhkCi7n1vwindb0+asgNqxj0B5rgNvZgYDR5WozgQDiMzm/hvI PHo0LK8yW2dIyNNAB4HJ6kL8/XY9bTFpn6pj2guVg1sPpnAOrunOhrLbBlyQHNM/r9XO IlWr3sOkB67bWwfziUGHLM9HbjWwkBq+4JJVNBingyZOnVi8WPzdJmmCSlIv6QNyw7/6 wCBUSdnRhCQnlU/5mMat9urCHNqRx8oR1cO1WI3BREBJWbhitDMDO2B2kXyxZAij0RYP XubSoj7zEFbPMKUorRHqubYpaWlcXx1Hs2viC4gdnIoDFO6Znw1ASNZ3CQN57J3GEwEr eYNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo14O8JzF479WBe5NPMEsyrgRIojz1ocVlRr012TfWmpUyAIT9lY 4lSGtusCYBCPmrhSIJkgAgrNV6ajfZb+KYBfaZTpLn49hhI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR5m7zNnotAOGeUmAbfer5Syj2MomHnToU6zyawsVEdniprLB3rBdUvphyotDgwxtIwt21dGqYu63hOVXWq70FU=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:9812:b0:741:973d:fe78 with SMTP id ji18-20020a170907981200b00741973dfe78mr12699567ejc.490.1662039228401; Thu, 01 Sep 2022 06:33:48 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOj+MMHh51M62Pn+=0Jic_P418rdzGuBBbpQk_CFNo09aHdqmA@mail.gmail.com> <BD3A75B9-B869-491D-8320-BA97EC702458@tsinghua.org.cn>
In-Reply-To: <BD3A75B9-B869-491D-8320-BA97EC702458@tsinghua.org.cn>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 15:33:37 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MMFPfdggtapb=VnOt4BANR-1CDYy4zMVW+m5d3PYXevdLQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Cc: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, Sue Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d00a9a05e79da929"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/rqYy4ZjMv40fdWi-cDVGopVNHZY>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Adoption and IPR call for draft-wang-idr-vpn-prefix-orf-03.txt (8/16 to 8/30)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2022 13:33:54 -0000

>
> On that one I think if there is a missing feature across all major vendors
> is per RD prefix limnit on eBGP VPNv4/v6 sessions.
>
> [WAJ] Current VPN Prefixes VRF is the base to achieve this goal. I think
> you should remember the initial aims in the earlier version are exactly the
> inter-AS option B/C scenarios.
>

I disagree.

No base is needed to implement that feature. This feature is simply per RD
or RD/RT prefix limit. Prefix ORF should not be part of this in any shape
or form.

Kind regards,
Robert

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email