Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 16 February 2017 12:39 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D31129578; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:39:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Gl_-wejMlpmn; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22b.google.com (mail-qt0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE621129566; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:39:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id v23so12732302qtb.0; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:39:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=CShJalkfJaqeJPB4jcsSd0Y9jT7UQG+kcq1WKonSMgo=; b=mdByE9V/1bjVR1nOWElIQ0o0lgolPWRa3NnxzDsJUL0ZXmqaXyvd+EkG6GI6MOgKFG H8r+BNf8vfwmHphYX3x9+deI5UFn2NanzOXqeXiaIatgIwAeyu1RpdLcXiF17tNjqVqK e4sd4uvoK1zLCmcpMyzRu/RETFjaqt3iEuH6p0OgnFvt7es64ExfTUUl/GuySeiJ0FRh elSUsykbaFZ6S6D9/Mj2/XioSMFPhPCFsOTMXAQ5uu3ApI+kvDNTl1moP24ExZNX/V5a ekwzgyW/hDOzSx/BPuqhCwQhsg9SYXnnEeAXCapS0a3lPaJXUFqSlF8lKru1Oj9sgA+C OEvA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=CShJalkfJaqeJPB4jcsSd0Y9jT7UQG+kcq1WKonSMgo=; b=PiSQB5ozHxecnU7FsXDMMN+gfDm9RXwsMhZzx5VJENmHhew+p2estH5QW+184jrDdH nBDF5USJY0VEifWHxins+NHdZvzhaH0AhmYiW289swLJ/yd8cCWStDldCJXI149PaLHe EoZ4O4d8arbei0LlPloZ8SbcJlTD7+0GcDl0oqSmSCGRFCJ5efY7GOE5SInekYVZP3hK Z0sysryEkD3bQh/xdcBlFHaScNBo0o4dSi7ferwV4U0kU6Nx9nedcR5g4p9166Vkb+Zc niMr0nB6f2W1wOsWtGsuV3hDT6DaXzGVfzjkTeVK9sjkmm0dQ46FADwLrjU8qzGTRV9b hiWA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lrqILAG5+W87i1spFaRW/R0HtTUwAnQjOh7QM2mSA/DJ2TAw90LxhLbjbn/n6ulELjxoODBnipaMP/7Q==
X-Received: by 10.237.43.36 with SMTP id p33mr1579215qtd.199.1487248784684; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:39:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.28.69 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:39:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.28.69 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 04:39:44 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <00f901d287e4$16ecb2f0$44c618d0$@ndzh.com>
References: <00f901d287e4$16ecb2f0$44c618d0$@ndzh.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 13:39:44 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ztrt8OKRQsz4_hFRuEanuIAi-e8
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERnPhRqrQds4Uu2sk4u-=nD7N81z6uA0oK=owOc59tvouQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c12507e80fcb40548a517fd
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/rrQFu1hiUdybyqcvM57AG4LZBOw>
Cc: idr wg <idr@ietf.org>, spring@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Idr] [spring] IDR WG 2 week WG LC on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe - (2/15/2017 to 3/1/2017)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 12:39:47 -0000

Support.

Thx
R.

On Feb 15, 2017 6:39 PM, "Susan Hares" <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:

> This begins a 2 week IDR WG last call on draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe
> from (2/15 to 3/1/2017)    There are two implementations describe on the
> wiki at:
>
> https://trac.ietf.org/trac/idr/wiki/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-
> segment-routing-epe%20
>
>
>
> The two implementation are from  Cisco IOS-XR release 6.0.2 and Cisco
> Nexus Switch N9000/N3000 platforms running NX-OS 7.0(3)I1(1) or greater.
> The authors will indicate on the list and in the wiki the following
> information :
>
>
>
> 1)      Were these implementations separate implementations?
>
> 2)      What were the results of the interoperability tests?
>
>
>
> This work is linked to the draft-ietf-spring-segment-routing-central-epe
> work in the SPRING WG. Based on the two drafts, the WG should might
> consider:
>
> 1)      Is there need for this work in deployments in networks/
>
> 2)      Is this technically ready for publication?
>
> 3)      Does it fit with the spring informational draft?
>
>
>
> For the ease of reference the web references are below:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe/
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-spring-segment-
> routing-central-epe/
>
>
>
> Sue Hares
>
> _______________________________________________
> spring mailing list
> spring@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/spring
>
>