IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129

heasley <heas@shrubbery.net> Tue, 01 November 2016 16:21 UTC

Return-Path: <heas@shrubbery.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA1C129576 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:21:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mute5Uz80P-R for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guelah.shrubbery.net (guelah.shrubbery.net [198.58.5.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3964C1295B8 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 09:20:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by guelah.shrubbery.net (Postfix, from userid 7053) id 013B074754; Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:20:55 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:20:55 +0000
From: heasley <heas@shrubbery.net>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Message-ID: <20161101162055.GA75985@shrubbery.net>
References: <169A4C1A-302E-4FE0-841A-ADA63E812E1F@juniper.net> <20161101144036.GB10519@pfrc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161101144036.GB10519@pfrc.org>
X-PGPkey: http://www.shrubbery.net/~heas/public-key.asc
X-note: live free, or die!
X-homer: i just want to have a beer while i am caring.
X-Claimation: an engineer needs a manager like a fish needs a bicycle
X-reality: only YOU can put an end to the embarrassment that is Tom Cruise
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/s0kaRyIEyDaDVv36KCC9UUPucKI>
Cc: IETF IDR Working Group <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Working group adoption call for draft-snijders-idr-deprecate-30-31-129
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2016 16:21:16 -0000

Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:40:36AM -0400, Jeffrey Haas:
> 2b. Some of these things are early implementations that are against drafts
> that aren't fully mature.  This means there will be versioning issues.
> Either the code point gets re-used and deals with the versioning problem or
> the code point needs deprecation.
> 
> And even then, the fact that there's an early implementation means that
> eventually a code point is needed.

shouldnt that implementation be done with 255 AND, regardless of an early
allocation, never leave the lab?  meaning that versioning is unnecessary,
in this scenario.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email