Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15
Susan Hares <skh@nexthop.com> Mon, 12 November 2001 16:23 UTC
Received: from trapdoor.merit.edu (postfix@trapdoor.merit.edu [198.108.1.26]) by nic.merit.edu (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA03973 for <idr-archive@nic.merit.edu>; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:23:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) id 4945691262; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:23:03 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: idr-outgoing@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix, from userid 56) id DC78391276; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:23:01 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: idr@trapdoor.merit.edu
Received: from segue.merit.edu (segue.merit.edu [198.108.1.41]) by trapdoor.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3185F91262 for <idr@trapdoor.merit.edu>; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:22:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) id 17D365DDD8; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:22:58 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: idr@merit.edu
Received: from presque.djinesys.com (presque.djinesys.com [198.108.88.2]) by segue.merit.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F555DD8F for <idr@merit.edu>; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:22:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from skh.nexthop.com (gateway3bo.networktwo.net [206.88.0.53]) by presque.djinesys.com (8.11.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id fACG5XE13229; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:05:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from skh@nexthop.com)
Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20011112110005.0330bd48@mail.nexthop.com>
X-Sender: skh@mail.nexthop.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:02:21 -0500
To: Alex Zinin <azinin@nexsi.com>
From: Susan Hares <skh@nexthop.com>
Subject: Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15
Cc: Susan Hares <skh@nexthop.com>, idr@merit.edu, jeffrey Haas <jhaas@nexthop.com>, Yakov Rekhter <yakov@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <3210831985.20011109135629@nexsi.com>
References: <5.0.0.25.0.20011107162314.01d39868@mail.nexthop.com> <5.0.0.25.0.20011107162314.01d39868@mail.nexthop.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Sender: owner-idr@merit.edu
Precedence: bulk
Alex: The files I sent use a table format for this approach. I was planning to provide an accompanying document with this information in it. We are just trying to correct the specification, I went with the 2nd document idea as a "compromise" I'd be glad to go and translate the state table document to your format, but I'd like some additional feedback whether this will be acceptable at this stage of the IDR document. Sue At 01:56 PM 11/9/2001 -0800, Alex Zinin wrote: >Sue, > > > I'd like 2nd to ask that the working group accepts this FSM rewrite. > > > I've re-written the state machine to be a bit cleaner in text. > > The Idle state had two sub-states so I cleaned this up by making each > > of these states a different text (Idle and Idle Hold) > > > Here are changes to the draft-15 FSM to make the FSM a bit clear. > >If we are to make the FSM textual description in the spec more or less >meaningful, I suggest we take some time and fix the section using >the following approach: > >8. BGP Finite State machine. > >8.1 BGP FSM Events > >For each event: > > Event : <event-name> > Description : <short-description> > Generation : <conditions when the event is generated> > >8.2 BGP Session States > >For each state, give a generic description, something like >the following: > > State : <state-name> > Description : <short description> > Valid events: <list of events expected and processed in this state, > others should be ignored> > In actions : <list of actions _always_ performed when > transitioning to the state> > Out actions : <list of actions _always_ performed when > transitioning from the state> > State actions: <list of actions performed (e.g. periodically) while > in this state> > >8.3 BGP FSM Definition > > FSM State : <one or many states> > FSM Event : <one or many events> > Next state: <new state if always the same> > Actions : <list of state/event-specific actions and state > transitions if condition-dependent> > >I'll take a look at the files you sent as well. > >Alex.
- Re: BGP MIB work Susan Hares
- Re: BGP MIB work Enke Chen
- BGP MIB work Susan Hares
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Alex Zinin
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Jeffrey Haas
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Jeffrey Haas
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 andrewl
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Susan Hares
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Susan Hares
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Susan Hares
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Susan Hares
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Susan Hares
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Alex Zinin
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Alex Zinin
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 andrewl
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Edward Crabbe
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Antal Sasvari
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Eric Gray
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 David Ball
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Enke Chen
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Ben Black
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Yakov Rekhter
- Re: FSM changes for the Draft-15 Randy Bush
- FSM changes for the Draft-15 Susan Hares
- Re: AS-wide Unique BGP Identifier Enke Chen
- Re: AS-wide Unique BGP Identifier Enke Chen
- Re: IDR WG Last Call Susan Hares
- Re: IDR WG Last Call Enke Chen
- Re: IDR WG Last Call Susan Hares
- Re: IDR WG Last Call Jeffrey Haas
- Re: IDR WG Last Call Russ White
- Re: IDR WG Last Call Enke Chen
- Re: IDR WG Last Call Jeffrey Haas
- Re: IDR WG Last Call Enke Chen
- Re: IDR WG Last Call Enke Chen
- Re: IDR WG Last Call Enke Chen