Re: [Idr] RFC-4893 handling malformed AS4_PATH attributes

Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 15 December 2008 20:41 UTC

Return-Path: <idr-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: idr-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-idr-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB0C28C124; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:41:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7ED128C124 for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:41:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 592bB3qxH723 for <idr@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168833A67F7 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 12:41:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AE771244051; Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:41:44 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:41:44 -0500
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Message-ID: <20081215204144.GF13757@slice>
References: <0016361e883459ba8b045e197e41@google.com> <B216E38D-5E44-4375-9CD0-E0E19C47636D@tcb.net> <0016361e883459ba8b045e197e41@google.com> <20081215181155.GC12768@slice> <5AAFFD16-AF24-4A3A-89BF-C912A46B9F7A@juniper.net> <20081215200051.GA13757@slice> <96DDB1FF-6C34-4255-8599-C540352D1F36@juniper.net> <20081215202851.GD13757@slice>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20081215202851.GD13757@slice>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11)
Cc: Inter-Domain Routing List <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] RFC-4893 handling malformed AS4_PATH attributes
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/idr>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: idr-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: idr-bounces@ietf.org

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 03:28:51PM -0500, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> Exactly.  This is the kind of thing that if you're going to have these
> sorts of responses, keeping internal records of discarded vs. repaired
> might be important for internal tie-breaking: I.e. prefer the routes
> that are less broken.
> 

A response off-list reminded me that I'd forgotten the smiley here.
This would never be a good idea.

-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
Idr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr