IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)

Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> Thu, 23 February 2017 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <job@ntt.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5AA129AB3 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:50:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.115
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FAKE_REPLY_C=1.486, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CuooaNjelGkC for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:50:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net (mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net [IPv6:2001:418:3ff:5::26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3377129A23 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Feb 2017 13:50:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail3.dllstx09.us.to.gin.ntt.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.88) (envelope-from <job@ntt.net>) id 1ch1Gw-000FXo-W3 (job@us.ntt.net); Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:50:09 +0000
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:49:57 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: idr@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20170223214957.GZ89584@hanna.meerval.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/saVVCf7vCjxLtb9-kwED78_P38o>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 21:50:13 -0000

resending, mailman rejected the many recipients

----- Forwarded message from Job Snijders <job@ntt.net> -----

Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:45:08 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
To: "Jakob Heitz (jheitz)" <jheitz@cisco.com>
Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "Srihari R Sangli (rsrihari)" <rsrihari@cisco.com>, "tappan@cisco.com"
	<tappan@cisco.com>, "yakov@juniper.net" <yakov@juniper.net>, "akatlas@gmail.com" <akatlas@gmail.com>, "db3546@att.com"
	<db3546@att.com>, "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>, "jgs@juniper.net" <jgs@juniper.net>, "shares@ndzh.com"
	<shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC4360 (4944)

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 09:26:48PM +0000, Jakob Heitz (jheitz) wrote:
> Reject.
> This will waste people's time opening the errata to try to find the
> difference.  The original makes sense and looks fine.

seconded.

Only after reading Jakob's phrase "waste of time" i realised what to
look for and saw the difference. :-)

Kind regards,

Job

----- End forwarded message -----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email