Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost-02.txt

"John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net> Fri, 22 May 2015 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jgs@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E40821A1A5B; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:50:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XS7StV7cbx_g; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0130.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA30A1A1A59; Fri, 22 May 2015 06:50:18 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=jgs@juniper.net;
Received: from [172.29.35.50] (66.129.241.11) by BLUPR05MB724.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.207.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.166.22; Fri, 22 May 2015 13:50:15 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150516095828.7350.47849.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 09:50:07 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <2CB8934F-DA50-4014-AD93-2C4E141BFDF0@juniper.net>
References: <20150516095828.7350.47849.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-Originating-IP: [66.129.241.11]
X-ClientProxiedBy: BY1PR10CA0016.namprd10.prod.outlook.com (25.160.197.26) To BLUPR05MB724.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.207.154)
X-Microsoft-Antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB724;
X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: <BLUPR05MB7245A1A4D163B5112434A2AAAC00@BLUPR05MB724.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-Test: UriScan:;
X-Exchange-Antispam-Report-CFA-Test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(520002)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR05MB724; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB724;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 058441C12A
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6049001)(6009001)(24454002)(51704005)(199003)(164054003)(377454003)(189002)(377424004)(40100003)(122386002)(101416001)(83716003)(87976001)(42186005)(57306001)(105586002)(76176999)(15975445007)(81156007)(50986999)(86362001)(77096005)(92566002)(4001540100001)(46102003)(110136002)(66066001)(64706001)(50226001)(62966003)(77156002)(97736004)(47776003)(2950100001)(68736005)(5001860100001)(5001830100001)(23746002)(50466002)(106356001)(33656002)(2351001)(5001960100002)(19580405001)(36756003)(19580395003)(450100001)(189998001)(230783001)(82746002)(104396002)(42262002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB724; H:[172.29.35.50]; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
Received-SPF: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 May 2015 13:50:15.8865 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB724
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/sdRNCEBYHne_XWZzZrBtwq-f3jQ>
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost-02.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 13:50:24 -0000

I notice this version is a big update compared to previous versions – you've abandoned NH-SAFI and are using BGP-LS instead. I personally have no problem with this change, but considering it's a working group draft, I think it would be a good idea for the authors to provide the WG with a summary of the motivation for the change.

Thanks,

– John

On May 16, 2015, at 5:58 AM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:

> 
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Inter-Domain Routing Working Group of the IETF.
> 
>        Title           : Carrying next-hop cost information in BGP
>        Authors         : Ilya Varlashkin
>                          Robert Raszuk
>                          Keyur Patel
>                          Manish Bhardwaj
>                          Serpil Bayraktar
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 10
> 	Date            : 2015-05-16
> 
> Abstract:
>   BGPLS provides a mechanism by which Link state and traffic
>   engineering information can be collected from internal networks and
>   shared with external network routers using BGP.  BGPLS defines a new
>   Address Family to exchange this information using BGP.
> 
>   BGP Optimal Route Reflection (ORR) provides a mechanism for a
>   centralized BGP Route Reflector to acheive requirements of a Hot
>   Potato Routing as described in Section 11 of [RFC4456].  Optimal
>   Route Reflection requires BGP ORR to overwrite the default IGP
>   location placement of the route reflector; which is used for
>   determining cost to the nexthop contained in the path.
> 
>   This draft augments BGPLS and defines a new extensions to exchange
>   cost information to next-hops for the purpose of calculating best
>   path from a peer perspective rather than local BGP speaker own
>   perspective.
> 
> 
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost/
> 
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost-02
> 
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-idr-bgp-nh-cost-02
> 
> 
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr