Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-04 (March 7 to March 21)

"Dhanendra Jain (dhjain)" <dhjain@cisco.com> Sun, 11 March 2018 16:23 UTC

Return-Path: <dhjain@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4A8126C89 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 09:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.53
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.53 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h8O-QP7cDDDF for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C7F3126579 for <idr@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 09:23:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12272; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1520785395; x=1521994995; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=Rc5Eg0elImvHPjMjcZErbBIrh4boMegDlNtVGHEmgsg=; b=QiGZReTP/eLYitgpF3INM1o4C7tcLMJ01YR8lImk/FM5/dztpCPx2wEE gBTDZcj+2T6KfOldDWRzO4K8Yc0hFkDRQowxgGCmhL8SRZjYodxGpsy27 pl9gbW/EC8rLZozI9Rw39Hq0ujLzYOeE0ad7Ik3yfAQ3fBI5vv3YNZsP3 Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AAAQDIVqVa/5ldJa1dGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQcBAQEBAYJaSS1mbygKg0aKH41vggSBFo8QhSIUggEKJYUAAhqCdyE0GAECAQEBAQEBAmsnhSMBAQEEI2YCAQgOAwMBAisCAgIwHQgBAQQBEoQ0ZA+obIEjgUxaJoRJg2qCFQWFNYIugVaCD4JPNoFHgWcCAwGBMF2CaDCCMgSTOYcdCQKGQYoggWOENYhJiXmHKAIREwGBKwEeOIFScBVkAYIYgj4mbQEIbXeJR4EvgRgBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.47,455,1515456000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="81895472"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Mar 2018 16:23:14 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w2BGNE7k021442 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 11 Mar 2018 16:23:14 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-007.cisco.com (173.37.102.17) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:23:13 -0500
Received: from xch-rcd-007.cisco.com ([173.37.102.17]) by XCH-RCD-007.cisco.com ([173.37.102.17]) with mapi id 15.00.1320.000; Sun, 11 Mar 2018 11:23:13 -0500
From: "Dhanendra Jain (dhjain)" <dhjain@cisco.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-04 (March 7 to March 21)
Thread-Index: AdO2MgZujpRAsp7XQFKnjQkuXD65bwDEnTIA
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 16:23:13 +0000
Message-ID: <BF5FE81D-515C-46B9-9A6D-A70D88BFE93A@cisco.com>
References: <011201d3b633$0b5fee60$221fcb20$@ndzh.com>
In-Reply-To: <011201d3b633$0b5fee60$221fcb20$@ndzh.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.28.0.171108
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.24.122.169]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BF5FE81D515C46B99A6DA70D88BFE93Aciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/se1hBhNT8cG_6bwOOlZitEKpeN4>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-04 (March 7 to March 21)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 16:23:17 -0000

Support.


  1.  Do you think BGP should carry these link state information regarding segment routing
Yes.

  1.  Are there any technical issues with this draft?
Don’t think so.

  1.  Is this draft is ready for publication?
Yes.

Thanks,
Dhanendra.


From: Idr <idr-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 8:41 AM
To: 'idr wg' <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: [Idr] WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-04 (March 7 to March 21)

This begins a 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-04.txt from March 7th to March 21.  During your discussion in the WG LC, please indicate the following things:


  1.  Do you think BGP should carry these link state information regarding segment routing,
  2.  Are there any technical issues with this draft?
  3.  Is this draft is ready for publication?

For your quick access to this draft, click on the link below:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext/


Susan Hares