Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14

Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 30 November 2018 18:36 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733B5130F2C; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:36:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GwjcJ2iLnZL8; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:36:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ot1-x329.google.com (mail-ot1-x329.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::329]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0678130F6C; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ot1-x329.google.com with SMTP id k98so6003821otk.3; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:36:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=z3w2GDV6YquK2kTwiIm84O3bQwYURPedjj+88h6N390=; b=nOOmVNcjTVhbYVDP2bTaX+oksKJcKVuyPZKz1LTp83nXFAdnEBF390gRMk3EkustUG BRcJATO8ZZace8QdEujL9Ygp/t3Unl+Yd/R2zwW3ybvcfyfOdE6jVk4bEHZDPDfvmhru ML91bbda2FewSNp9sgD7AuAFK0uL9edi4xUxtCzUOujIT1Ne5cfj/x68QH4HP1axTY7I Aka9JPxdNXOgdwxJiGHces7JmKEKMIXxx4F2odVMO5so7WI/S0LcdC+L4wsASDjmcuxT 98kZKGu4f5aW5XfLWhk8xrNc17igpfsGz1LYJf8y+X/prXPVWgDvRtXsKFLk+lVOyVf6 HH2Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=z3w2GDV6YquK2kTwiIm84O3bQwYURPedjj+88h6N390=; b=epT/b+/DvDNAENFUo24zJugbRJehrAA7s/OsdALI8Cez3Inc+Mu4leJFXVXDAWAiOS 6lWr0LMi7hgUl8UdWIA00dfCkB2gd7sTlfcwC0O6+VZgkbId6zCkXOjS/2GVcv9xJCgZ t6YTU3iQFrdEgenfwKv8S+Kb1tyn8Z7k1tEUiX/Rq+RG+yQie7qX2Pa+9CWOOIIKVKEN appt1FOFxpDExsON75Ssdl6mWqHBRBbLMhjwsJWHcrdBNfj/JC64yBfuThd4l30bal/z j9bP0FeCRGOMfx25PamdMEH2/OnrTsmAZ9y4y8dMTv5WrS9LRCHX6PGBrSEc2Um2gI+S zokQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AA+aEWYoM6QgWhFV1xmDc5GjVoipcL0bjdcZcrFIaf4U0tXA17MDKTG4 zXxAoVRcuw5em9fPpQ9dHK8ogQMKv8fGO+7SJDQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AFSGD/UbqoNU9sz2+hkH9Idf0MDtcxPKfjZjYO07jQHfg3N7LI58oGrbFgCoAzRFyTu00I4ZDQtB850UofXXQPSiZqA=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3437:: with SMTP id v52mr4407152otb.50.1543603000286; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 10:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:36:39 -0500
From: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <e0219b4ef0cc4321822ad092201192af@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
References: <CAMMESsyXWjVrCMG83HUUmMrSNzUvPvdRE6PSa7OAmOJgNtzMpg@mail.gmail.com> <e0219b4ef0cc4321822ad092201192af@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail (528)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 13:36:39 -0500
Message-ID: <CAMMESswNEekYaAhPdvrUcjDjVFWsidjoAO3t54JAHkvo7w8p+w@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp@ietf.org>
Cc: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>, "idr-chairs@ietf.org" <idr-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000081aa90057be6142c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/soR6L-gYBRo-Io77xnP9HI5Rsyo>
Subject: Re: [Idr] AD Review of draft-ietf-idr-te-pm-bgp-14
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 18:36:50 -0000

Hi!

Please change the reference.

I don’t foresee any delays in the processing
of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis.  Do you (you are the lead Editor)?

Thanks!

Alvaro.

On November 29, 2018 at 12:58:40 PM, Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) (
ginsberg@cisco.com) wrote:

I am fine with all of your comments – but I do have one concern.



You suggest replacing the reference to RFC7810 with a reference to
draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis.

If we do that then the publication of this document will be blocked on the
publication of draft-ietf-lsr-isis-rfc7810bis. But the changes being made
in the bis draft do not affect the content of this document in any way. So
it makes more sense to me to continue to reference RFC 7810.



I’ll go with whatever you decide, but wanted to raise this point before
making the suggested change.

???