[Idr] Cross-check wrt draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Fri, 22 November 2019 04:46 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F3E120103 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:46:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.595
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.595 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XLLuRvWubLBo for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:46:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55A7212002F for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Nov 2019 20:46:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (vs3.iomartmail.com []) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xAM4k87g004636; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:46:08 GMT
Received: from vs3.iomartmail.com (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F262203A; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:46:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown []) by vs3.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F04F22032; Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:46:08 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V (dhcp-9cac.meeting.ietf.org []) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id xAM4k63B022341 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:46:07 GMT
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <idr@ietf.org>
Cc: <rfc-ise@rfc-editor.org>, <donatas.abraitis@hostinger.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:46:05 -0000
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <007c01d5a0ef$c13b8930$43b29b90$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdWg7ZMUE3ZuuxGLSUGp3Y4S1Tudtw==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--10.902-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--10.902-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--10.902000-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: ZRt6D9EtTrhWGgzQsSLghLIGMNfiwa5NKewn0ypBI6XLkl8e9W70ixGG Vq+vrXC0LtEqw00npB0AnjbK7R7HAuDocHyqS9Hw4h8r8l3l4eapvf+jmz45wzsH7+Wszzg7vAC bPSJBQvVy77BciXetb+wBgaifTRWrC+l9fIf3S2xQUls+WYG/w3hejHrzFWVA5kyJys6UhUmTlN ttMNvuDhWAjR9Lt4fFrCxUfUEf1SmfVuwUmQnhp+wOy/qtohQh4EsW6XI+QWfTrP/dGbI2Z1toN q9iyPJt4CaYlLH2E9zs/DJZkHxC4ttRqavanwTMPyaHVwjtlgZ9LQinZ4QefL6qvLNjDYTwzhtq OA7SSC/dRmGuWm4EBdAtbEEX0MxBxEHRux+uk8h+ICquNi0WJDOLqizqmrx1Rg+4pAw5N69c9eV B8boD7wupmDFaE77zftwZ3X11IV0=
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/swpLXo7imr0i8gNQqvA2I1J6Hhc>
Subject: [Idr] Cross-check wrt draft-abraitis-bgp-version-capability
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 04:46:13 -0000


Donatas has brought his little draft to me to consider for publication on
the Independent Stream.

We will be doing some edits along the way (including to mark the document as
not on the Standards Track).

I'm aware that there have been some discussions about this document in IDR
with debate about whether a more generic attribute would be useful, and
discussion about whether a well-known format of the version identifier
should be used.

The document is going forward in its current form and this is not a request
to reopen those old conversations, but reviews and comments are welcome.

This email serves two purposes:
1. To let you know of our plans for this document
2. To offer IDR the last chance to say "No, wait! This work really does need
to be done within the working group."

Independent Submissions Editor (ISE)