Re: [Idr] Thoughts on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hares-idr-bgp-registries-01.txt

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Tue, 14 March 2017 20:48 UTC

Return-Path: <rraszuk@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653981314E0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:48:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.197, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LncSNLZkNJoo for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 328C21314DD for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id i34so65527454qtc.0 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:48:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=aSwOop25uJVYAjyExfHxifX3fMGKRRXsSaCZpT+jOG0=; b=Wux5blx58/gccJY/DYhtAhpLqBqfAaOvt+6vqo6mf6tt91r3h8VcJQOCa4WH7iQtXN ilUP3DUwAuOz6+fOcE70rLgE+WNnRfAVtjPoT+s5su//AV68pyf9TZc463JlEam+kg03 po7HvWBOgvlWraDn3WaRHxNfL0cQQvYoMHTdWCLT+b9SKSLySmdc6qLCEJnQkaGx8LVs 7jN0RQlFo1ftcXT/XhiRfLshF3gQxEtBJtpFC+f2jQSgiL1HL/+l6ILuaCiAvM51JKsE TKM7sZn4YFOo+nzuagv2Objwh/XLiWK0LyJEHiTRPN8oaARu8p32oEnHVfPO7+Fwvh7Y lpWw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aSwOop25uJVYAjyExfHxifX3fMGKRRXsSaCZpT+jOG0=; b=HavqRRePaMmqi9/XXqOTEsIlvW+M0BxaDzF38Jwif50gBLX31Hyzpyzxruw400yC9W z7M+6eal2BcjyzTr5rnd4OItxhosKLa7G1TeIZYUSTLy8QmuY3PVWReTStdxuJ5314Gi 8wztttyGiOQ2Xh7Vqh8LryvSq9oV8mL8VpeHv2jF4PsMnEcIsBznbq5djzOl8/4tVvZl G0tOFZ7onZF5Qx8bwBoSdTtDTgp8E8qmMGpXLY0xJfbil0sjOFiy/NQmAyJlrJKaxhz4 p0LLfHRf+eOca5j5YEgdtXoAzAFY2Iq8NtQpL5S8fyRG2j9ET+eCvMf+bTcEEd5qjarM 5arQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k9+5zFWOuJE/AfDXWnWnb87Dku3HcNz6D1xADbDFXtGgjHGz5OeG7pIOmrLr/ojTQnYxeJaDbnOhmsaQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.0.25 with SMTP id a25mr37487764qtg.199.1489524491285; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:48:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: rraszuk@gmail.com
Received: by 10.140.42.181 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 13:48:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20170314204414.GE12864@pfrc.org>
References: <048701d29cd9$15204b80$3f60e280$@olddog.co.uk> <022201d29ce6$ffb2ba40$ff182ec0$@ndzh.com> <c369a60a-3ccc-bf7d-dd29-d289d7a6b67e@juniper.net> <CA+b+ERkZmsd3DbS54pcQtLH3j+vbg+ViVtOJmteqgwQHYTacgQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170314204414.GE12864@pfrc.org>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 21:48:10 +0100
X-Google-Sender-Auth: DXT6QsKTK1ueC7ZEDPGWLDTz8OY
Message-ID: <CA+b+ERkgc+XDHQa75V+pPs_uPyPn0jus=ozkQ7Gjs74t3i-_rQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
Cc: Eric C Rosen <erosen@juniper.net>, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>, idr wg <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f403045e73622ffe41054ab6f2e1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/tKz1IwyaV7q__HM1I2L0Dof-RDs>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Thoughts on https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-hares-idr-bgp-registries-01.txt
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:48:13 -0000

It's not that IANA is slow ... it's the process that get's you to IANA is a
bottleneck.

Can anyone submits a draft to IANA to get code point without any IETF
sponsorship ?



On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 9:44 PM, Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 09:34:32PM +0100, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> > All what needs to be done to prevent squatting is a public wiki page in
> > IETF (across WGs) with pool of available BGP attribute code points as
> well
> > as AFI/SAFIs where whoever has a draft and is implementing it ahead of
> IETF
> > politics takes next available code and links it with a draft name. Then
> she
> > or he may come to WG with proven implementation at hand.
>
> In praise of IANA, their FCFS turnaround is quite fast.  They satisfy all
> of
> the necessary properties above.
>
> No need for wiki here.
>
>
> -- Jeff (otherwise a wiki fan)
>