Re: [Idr] [GROW] draft-snijders-idr-shutdown-00: Drop a line in the peer's syslog at shutdown

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Sun, 20 November 2016 22:09 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0F3129503; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:09:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gKHTyKyGW1LO; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:09:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F16C9128874; Sun, 20 Nov 2016 14:09:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: grow@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id uAKM9QZP097501 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 20 Nov 2016 22:09:29 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8] claimed to be crumpet.local
Message-ID: <58321F15.9000105@foobar.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 23:09:25 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.7 (Macintosh/20161117)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Neil J. McRae" <neil@domino.org>
References: <FBD63625-3E82-44AC-9318-D6B6DFE86082@domino.org> <CAO367rVSyeBcJnt8yogV27POyS3VwWGCqgmD3ex79dUPN-Misg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=EFuQ8L_A4VtdzWna4ZNM-rhPo8gXURaN2s3WAykrL+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAO367rX9gBfNHgqmy0NqiNMGkjzLRATj6PdiDYk_M1fAQx5s8g@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkMsCGhyHsttjq0Pout0vrAvGQ6F+HaTxr8=78YMeRFOA@mail.gmail.com> <58306620.4000308@foobar.org> <319AD952-C571-4085-8D56-C06A51F021E3@domino.org> <CA+b+ERnQ8FQXxJ6No6GUr9mdp7APRkULqsGbKf5bAigp34TvmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAO367rW_TuXsMNJBanAc2gL66TW8s4p2u5zDKfHER5rb1rk7-Q@mail.gmail.com> <058F756D-3A68-4AA6-A9DC-63A1BF9A5184@domino.org> <20161119194138.GG47336@dhcp-9d92.meeting.ietf.org> <87DDAB88-78AC-431A-ABE7-55249BF5D654@domino.org> <5830CAEB.7070400@foobar.org>, <f35845b1-cfe6-acb8-c3d0-2bc46a43d6f6@lahai.com> <83A8E52C-DBD8-4321-99A0-58672EBE5430@domino.org>
In-Reply-To: <83A8E52C-DBD8-4321-99A0-58672EBE5430@domino.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/tPlSA1CGh3RIbB3TWGbXXCO68uY>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [GROW] draft-snijders-idr-shutdown-00: Drop a line in the peer's syslog at shutdown
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2016 22:09:36 -0000

Neil J. McRae wrote:
> I would be deploying automation to take care of network
> problems/issues/whatever whether I worked at BT or I was the admin of
> a network with four and a half nodes.

For sure.  e.g. we've automated the hell out of INEX (which has more
than 4.5 nodes btw).  The point is that most ASNs are a good deal
smaller than this, and less amenable to automation than IXPs.  There's
simply no point in writing automation software to handle one or two
routers with 5 or fewer ebgp sessions between them, which describes the
overwhelming majority of ASNs in the world.

> We have the world and his wife automating and innovating on top of
> -our- internet platform and we are still encouraging behaviours like
> it was 1992 (I'd say like mission control in the 60s but I think they
> had more automation back then!)

Rather than castigating people for their shortsightedness, did you take
the time to ask e.g. Job why a large carrier like NTT might want this
feature?  Their network is likely to be highly automated.

Nick