[Idr] Re: Security Considerations for rfc4360bis (was Re: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-00.txt)
Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org> Mon, 01 December 2025 21:44 UTC
Return-Path: <jhaas@pfrc.org>
X-Original-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: idr@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5766D9393C53 for <idr@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:44:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n4GT0VROL2yl for <idr@mail2.ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:44:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slice.pfrc.org (slice.pfrc.org [67.207.130.108]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DAB9393C4C for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 13:44:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (99-188-202-8.lightspeed.livnmi.sbcglobal.net [99.188.202.8]) by slice.pfrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B9D191E24F; Mon, 1 Dec 2025 16:44:01 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AD72B334-B7EC-49C8-9130-0B28624CA84D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.10\))
From: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAH6gdPyLGuck81AmRRp2baH82_rC=QGjOovrq9LD4GpBeVdE9Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2025 16:44:01 -0500
Message-Id: <3CC35BF7-E183-46F0-9D9B-B7541CC141C3@pfrc.org>
References: <175716842438.2015869.7460050885014908474@dt-datatracker-f7c8fdcb7-pjx77> <CAKEJeo6BJ69hNusDnuz47Y5DGT3EbkaiH=WqQz_LNHx4AHJB=w@mail.gmail.com> <1049FB53-F2F0-4AF3-BF35-99C9C33B3D61@pfrc.org> <CAH6gdPyLGuck81AmRRp2baH82_rC=QGjOovrq9LD4GpBeVdE9Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.10)
Message-ID-Hash: D4AIQCMOHSUQTRTXQBKNRNGCOU6ROBCW
X-Message-ID-Hash: D4AIQCMOHSUQTRTXQBKNRNGCOU6ROBCW
X-MailFrom: jhaas@pfrc.org
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-idr.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [Idr] Re: Security Considerations for rfc4360bis (was Re: Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-00.txt)
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/tYeC12vP7oUJCOVLNNwA8R8zMSc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:idr-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:idr-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:idr-leave@ietf.org>
Ketan/WG, > On Nov 19, 2025, at 12:15 PM, Ketan Talaulikar <ketant.ietf@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hello Nat/Srihari, > > You might have seen this thread on the LBW draft: list: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/IaGwPsH7gLTJoeRrbI1ney1RgD0/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/IaGwPsH7gLTJoeRrbI1ney1RgD0/> > > Wanted to bring to your attention that the Security Considerations in the rfc4360bis needs some work. Nat has proposed the following: https://github.com/ietf-wg-idr/draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis/pull/26 The text is modest and refers to the BGP operational considerations as well. Please consider reviewing the PR and proposing some text there. -- Jeff
- [Idr] I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-00.t… internet-drafts
- [Idr] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-… Nat Kao
- [Idr] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-… Robert Raszuk
- [Idr] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-… Nat Kao
- [Idr] Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-idr-rfc4360-bis-… Jeffrey Haas
- [Idr] Security Considerations for rfc4360bis (was… Ketan Talaulikar
- [Idr] Re: Security Considerations for rfc4360bis … Jeffrey Haas
- [Idr] Re: Security Considerations for rfc4360bis … Ketan Talaulikar
- [Idr] Re: Security Considerations for rfc4360bis … Jeffrey Haas