Re: [Idr] WG Last Call on Proposed IANA procedures for BGP Well-known communities

[Yakov Rekhter <[e-mail]>]

Thomas,

> Yakov - 
> you are right, the email list is the place to determine WG consensus.
> 
> The online polls are just there for convenience and in order to stick 
> to the email list rule, their results shall be posted to the list _once_, 
> say during the weekend.

Just to make it clear, the results of this poll have no impact on 
determining the IDR WG consensus.

> I am neutral to the actual discussion, but I thought the online poll could 
> serve as convenient service to the wg.
> The available online poll options are documented below.
> Thomas

Yakov.

> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> {leave blank [ ] or tick [X] to indicate your selection}
> 
> Which way do you support Brian's proposal?
> No selection limitation
>    [  ] Support generally the adoption of such a proposal
>    [  ] Do not support generally the adoption of such a proposal
>    [  ] If yes to the first, support Standards Action plus FCFS
>    [  ] If yes to the first, support just FCFS
> 
> Well-Known vs. Standards-Action
> You may select 1 option
>    [  ] Rename Well-Known to Standards-Action?
>    [  ] Add an 'Also Known As Standards-Action' to Well-Known?
>    [  ] Neither one
> 
> Assignment strategy options
> You may select 1 option
>    [  ] Support Early Assignment of Standards-Action Communities, per RFC
>           4020?
>    [  ] Do not support Early Assignment of Standards-Action Communities,
>           per RFC 4020?
>    [  ] Allow Early Assignment for Individual Internet Drafts?
>    [  ] Do not allow Early Assignment for Individual Internet Drafts (WG
>           drafts only)?
> 
> What does 'Well-Known' status represent?
> You may select 1 option
>    [  ] multiple implementations
>    [  ] other -> please post a reply with the criteria
> 
> Allotted time for achieving 'Well-Known' (permanent) status for any Early 
> Assignments?
> You may select 1 option
>    [  ] 6 months
>    [  ] 1 year
>    [  ] 18 months
>    [  ] 2 years
>    [  ] other -> please post your criteria
>    [  ] never
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> On Tue, 12 Aug 2008, Yakov Rekhter wrote:
> 
> > Brian,
> >
> >> Thanks to Thomas M. Knoll, there is now a poll available for soliciting
> >> opinions regarding the subject of this message.
> >>
> >> (Proposed IANA procedures for BGP Well-known communities.)
> >>
> >> http://www.bgp-qos.org/forum/viewforum.php?f=12
> >>
> >> In the interests of gauging the WG's collective opinions on the general
> >> proposal, and on my specific suggestions on how future community
> >> proposals might be evaluated, you are all invited to participate in the
> >> poll.
> >
> > Speaking as an IDR WG co-chair, please note that the IDR WG consensus
> > is determined using the IDR WG mailing list, and not by the results
> > of the poll you mentioned above.
> >
> > So, "gauging the WG's collective opinion" on any proposal, is done
> > on the IDR mailing list, and not by participating in the poll you
> > mentioned above.
> >
> >> Of course, follow-ups (either in the forum, or on the IDR list) are also
> >> strongly encouraged.
> >>
> >> It's a short poll, just a few questions, but will likely help inform the
> >> WG chair as to the sense of the "room".
> >
> > See above.
> >
> > Yakov.
> >
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> Brian Dickson
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Idr mailing list
> >> [e-mail]
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> > _______________________________________________
> > Idr mailing list
> > [e-mail]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr
> >
> >
_______________________________________________
Idr mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr