Re: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)

stefano previdi <stefano@previdi.net> Tue, 07 April 2020 11:13 UTC

Return-Path: <stefano@previdi.net>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578723A0D83 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 04:13:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=previdi-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bsdAVmheK-Ny for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 04:13:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x331.google.com (mail-wm1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B7DA3A0CB5 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Apr 2020 04:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x331.google.com with SMTP id y20so1380411wma.4 for <idr@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 04:13:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=previdi-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KsR/6BCoMcT3kTLObiBC80gQWFvnWWi137M0mueJYN8=; b=irTawAWlKoRuAqEp7PCGPAJS35I0pMAF+/xx3JJTn5ce7003WIqSk3KCbtJPppb/wi uvQOyVx7rmYcPSTo2F0uCE9x99UurdeM7s9JJNmMQL3+pkSlUaV9Nxec3u3Zh+aHt1iZ WhwdPPM1cpXAtE1VRLSZXFGUlz1TtfacsPJbYx8RgvZBpRzZ9WWBwe3LuHKKWUA5F96+ 459XzvoRCg1mIyT/g1VCCWlqP0/X21H8c9PMOj+tbFEi4a31VYmSaKoe6Vh7D8i4qNHt 4FHDhxXiUs2tpc2ALngXoXGAXCczMUY58hWqKC4DPBWAvehUxNruLmzL/UeCLQAIaq/L fIRw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=KsR/6BCoMcT3kTLObiBC80gQWFvnWWi137M0mueJYN8=; b=S+6jlK/rDG+CeCP5LaZqUdebh4ufcxd5E57rVDQm1siNlN2KVt0Zjcb216c82kOMQt vCZ1x7OE/Vj+/fbi7/6FdGvptnqH5GekwmyrUPwcfDUB/9qO+odZ/H+DXIlxADBjvu0K M6PC0rP74qv6yWqiAUag448qg0n57Km0YHWPWhvAyqcjtsJkLRG3qsc1s0UGGsv+98GR 7T3P+xipWQmJA2jo3IlHEH3ztaWWEHQ16mhoCZPU0rQ2Th3UltvrCsOWLS8pNhQ61J99 BRua3PeKm/jZCTcAcqpqS6A6DYYwNUyjcbvhwiX5pp6xYsRKPu5wXdXw1QiiZawuh7Ig ruHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY15CYj1UEuDWWhqxFsfZR2JnUbuoHSS/s1BAbU1kGteeA2MMX6 iR0Dt7ahkcUIpbDXp7mLCLkxXQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLxbmSdH7DEgXpw4I5ZB1ii20I/hUkkK4pfdzeCs3rfyp5NTHkRzGph9/2JAJE7WxVYiwKNIA==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:b356:: with SMTP id c83mr1984139wmf.10.1586258010274; Tue, 07 Apr 2020 04:13:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.5] (net-93-147-205-245.cust.vodafonedsl.it. [93.147.205.245]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f20sm1863610wmc.35.2020.04.07.04.13.29 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Apr 2020 04:13:29 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: stefano previdi <stefano@previdi.net>
In-Reply-To: <01a201d6068f$c1f3aaf0$45db00d0$@ndzh.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 13:13:29 +0200
Cc: IDR List <idr@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <56F4C3D3-3610-463D-96ED-06A3FD004EE7@previdi.net>
References: <01a201d6068f$c1f3aaf0$45db00d0$@ndzh.com>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/u2avx_cmxGYocNJUSSVyGkPbreI>
Subject: Re: [Idr] WG Adoption - draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt - 2 Week WG adoption call (3/30 - 4/13)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2020 11:13:34 -0000

I support the adoption. 

Thanks.
s.


> On Mar 30, 2020, at 2:35 PM, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> This begins a 2 week WG adoption call for draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu-03.txt 
>  
> You can view this draft at: 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-li-idr-sr-policy-path-mtu/
>  
> This draft distributes path maximum transmission unit for the 
> SR policy via BGP.  
>  
> Any discussion regarding on whether one desires 
> SR Policy should be clearly distinguished from the 
> Technical discussions on the mechanisms to pass SR policy MTU. 
>  
> The questions for the people to discuss on this draft are: 
>  
> 1) Is there a need for this mechanism in networks using 
>         MPLS-SR or SR-V6 and SR policy? 
>  
> 2) Are there any error handling issues besides what is being 
>      Taken care of in RFC7752bis-03.txt
>  
> 3) Do you think this draft is ready to be adopted? 
>      In this category, please list any concerns you have
>      regarding adoption.  This category can include 
>      general concerns about BGP-LS, MPLS-SR, 
>     SR-V6, and SR-Policy.   
>  
> Cheers, Sue Hares  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr