[Idr] WG Status as of 11/12/2020
Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> Thu, 12 November 2020 22:46 UTC
Return-Path: <shares@ndzh.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56543A0E93 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:46:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.225
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX=2.845, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.276, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KL9I2NIHapkr for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hickoryhill-consulting.com (50-245-122-97-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [50.245.122.97]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE36E3A0E91 for <idr@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Nov 2020 14:46:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Default-Received-SPF: pass (skip=forwardok (res=PASS)) x-ip-name=50.107.115.222;
From: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
To: idr@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 17:46:11 -0500
Message-ID: <038601d6b945$a431fdf0$ec95f9d0$@ndzh.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0387_01D6B91B.BB5E3FE0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ada5RRYUI3ZkonGvT++l2UkrrH1PbA==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 201112-6, 11/12/2020), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Not-Tested
X-Authenticated-User: skh@ndzh.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/uaS_JZEGTZrYDZB-r1SkbrwFndI>
Subject: [Idr] WG Status as of 11/12/2020
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2020 22:46:29 -0000
Greetings: The status is below. I will be sending another status on Sunday after I complete more shepherd reports. Please send me a note if you are going to request WG adoption at IETF 109 or WG LC. If I have missed any early allocation request, WG LC request, or WG adoption request - please let me know. Cheerily, Sue ------- RFC editor queue 1) draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-25 - 2) draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-segment-routing-epe-19 3) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-segment-routing-ext-16 Past IETF LC 1) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps/> draft-ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps-20 Status: Awaiting AD go ahead Next step: IESG Review Shepherd: Susan Hares 2) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis/> draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-08 Status: Post IESG review, Awaiting AD follow-up Shepherd: Susan Hares 3) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6/> draft-ietf-idr-flow-spec-v6-19 Status: Post IESG review, New Draft needed Shepherd: John Scudder IESG Publication request done 1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-registry-01 Status: AD's queue, 11 days Shepherd: Jie Dong 2) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-optimal-route-reflection-21 Status: AD's queue, 0 days (entered today) Shepherd: Susan Hares 3) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param/> draft-ietf-idr-ext-opt-param-09 Status: AD queue, 0 days (entered today) Shepherd: Susan Hares IESG Shepherd Report 1) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution/> draft-ietf-idr-eag-distribution-12 Status: Shepherd report submitted, Revised ID needed Shepherd: Susan Hares Note: minor fixes, will aim to publish on Monday am 2) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy/> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-13 Status: Shepherd's in progress, ETA 11/15/2020 Note: Editorial changes on security section and Enforcement/error handling pending Shepherd: Susan Hares 3) draft-ietf-rs-bfd-09.txt Status report: Shepherd Verifying implementations Shepherd: Susan Hares Past WG LC awaiting implementations 1) draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-l2vpn WG LC: 6/24 to 7/8/2020 WG LC: 11/1 to 11/16 1) draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-flex-algo-04 2) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr/> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-03 3) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions/> draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-sbfd-extensions-03 4) <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext/> draft-ietf-idr-bgpls-srv6-ext-04 Shepherd: Susan Hares Status: Initial Shepherd Report, ETA 11/15/2020 Next steps: All author groups should recheck Implementation reports as WG LC appears to have consensus. Note: Additional reviewers with BGP-LS experience are needed to review the documents. WG adoption: (11/1 to 11/16) 1. <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu/> draft-zhu-idr-bgp-ls-path-mtu-04 (will be renamed draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-link-mtu-00.txt) Status: IDR will adopt if WG adoption successful, but If LSR adopts may transfer to LSR For single draft in LSR for IGP and BGP. Next step: 11/15 announcement of adoption status 2. <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit/> draft-qin-idr-sr-policy-ifit-04 Shepherd: Susan Hares Status: Adoption in process, some support Next step: 11/15 announcement of adoption status Early Allocation Requests: 1) outstanding from BESS WG
- [Idr] WG Status as of 11/12/2020 Susan Hares