IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-02 (1/17 to 1/31/2017)

Teun Vink <teun@bit.nl> Thu, 19 January 2017 08:15 UTC

Return-Path: <teun@bit.nl>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D7312940F; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:15:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bit.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JHGMkBW_J0vk; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:15:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.bit.nl (smtp.bit.nl [IPv6:2001:7b8:3:5::25:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FD11293F9; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 00:15:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bit.nl; s=smtp01; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Content-Type:References: In-Reply-To:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=aIRHT5nojZS1V0ivWBhOpToRb/ebw30oLsijpWkpTAE=; b=d0AV8s3+v0yHbvkeOh+SCrGlQg PEAol9eEPMGD3AZC/UqpmXC4MUgW+0f7gzJD2oTqCTRD/QllTd23e1gbHtrgR0IpFhyf10JEq0BmQ QWLv+PJusk8GMppchSFZo8I8RHleV1/hqROrCt7l+Hvm+HfTo2FVBPk4NYy8iqy2nN+c9cUTMAeMm lUP0KNVITyhsPNuAujPUkaC7Aa1KN2JOj2sh5CJL2OF6bBntAlKIYouwVDBjvG9Lpl5eb//GTE0n+ VHP18aT19sJA5cuJtwsgAY119A9hw02WMpPJnyAAWbzNmydOaczMMAwLgG7rsbaatuw1xD0QIf9sZ +0JlEQgA==;
Received: from [2001:7b8:3:1000:921b:eff:fe8a:4cb1] (port=38422) by smtp2.smtp.dmz.bit.nl with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from <teun@bit.nl>) id 1cU7sS-0000Cb-3r; Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:15:24 +0100
Message-ID: <1484813714.8565.74.camel@moridin>
From: Teun Vink <teun@bit.nl>
To: idr@ietf.org, draft-ietf-idr-shutdown@ietf.org
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 09:15:14 +0100
In-Reply-To: <01b801d27105$45702bc0$d0508340$@ndzh.com>
References: <01b801d27105$45702bc0$d0508340$@ndzh.com>
Organization: BIT BV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/ulx4zfuzIO9CamcOGBqXhqP7YHc>
Subject: Re: [Idr] 2 week WG LC for draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-02 (1/17 to 1/31/2017)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:15:29 -0000

On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 16:04 -0500, Susan Hares wrote:
> This begins a 2 week WG Last Call for draft-ietf-idr-shutdown-02.txt
> (1/17/2017 to 1/31/2017).  Section 7 of this document lists the
> implementations that have been created for this BGP functionality.
> These include: ExaBGP, pmacct, OpenBGPD, Wireshark (packet analyzer),
> and tcpdump
> 
>  
>    o  ExaBGP [1]
>    o  pmacct [2]
>    o  OpenBGPD [3]
>    o  Wireshark [4] (packet analyser)
> ·         tcpdump [5], (alt) [6] (packet analyser)
> 
>  
> 
> Operators should examine if freeform UTF-8 encoded string as described
> meets their operational needs.  


Full support here, I really hope this will become a truly accepted and
implemented operational standard and that it will reduce the number of
"hey I see a peering session drop" mails and calls we have to deal with
after every maintenance. 

UTF-8 sounds like a sane choice for string encoding.

Best regards,
-- 
Teun Vink
BIT           | teun@bit.nl     | +31 318 648 688
KvK: 09090351 | GPG: 0x5A04F4E2 | RIPE: TEUN-RIPE

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email