Re: [Idr] Alvaro's AD Comments on draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Mon, 05 October 2015 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA061B4F6E for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ReZxEZM4Q_k for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 236001B4F66 for <idr@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 12:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1130; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444074770; x=1445284370; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=VpxRBaIuFmUhfTXCNdQyfXpDdxKh+yO0VYKt2ghlr9c=; b=j5o5xu5JC3+kBbrKund05U/xLjHwq28Iv59Kw3lYaab4rjWalFpLkrRy MLYvHnljqWK/w5ISyxasYU/jW3g/XvFyadCqQ67hmBrKEBwGDoZmknFLr nqO4H6mI8E9/1hQSVFWSzRYqK6RSLf0ysmagLv3gBE9U7b0D/i1iJ10UQ g=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ABAgAJ1BJW/49dJa1egyeBQga+DwENgVqGGgIcgRo4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoQlAQEENDcOEAIBCA4OKAICMCUBAQQBDQWILowxnSwGlCABAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXgRyFVwGEfYRaMweCY4FJAQSSSYMzAY0WgVaWHoNvHwEBQoIRHYFUcYc5gQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,640,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="194646492"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Oct 2015 19:52:49 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (xch-aln-014.cisco.com [173.36.7.24]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t95JqnPT022776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:52:49 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) by XCH-ALN-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:52:48 -0500
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (173.36.12.79) by xch-aln-014.cisco.com (173.36.7.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:52:48 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x15.cisco.com ([169.254.9.98]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:52:48 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Jeffrey Haas <jhaas@pfrc.org>, Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Thread-Topic: [Idr] Alvaro's AD Comments on draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution
Thread-Index: AdD9yQO60fpcSwLyRE2qgwPvotAKewA66wGAADvqdh8AAttmAA==
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 19:52:48 +0000
Message-ID: <D2384D0A.D6717%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <022901d0fdc9$0ea4ce80$2bee6b80$@olddog.co.uk> <D2369A00.D559D%aretana@cisco.com> <02bd01d0fee7$5678c440$036a4cc0$@olddog.co.uk> <20151005193445.GV5754@pfrc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20151005193445.GV5754@pfrc.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.36.7.23]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="euc-kr"
Content-ID: <32ED44649C1C3C45B648138059BC6D86@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/uyBTAvjdZLs2uii3BcGxJMNWJng>
Cc: "idr@ietf.org" <idr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Idr] Alvaro's AD Comments on draft-ietf-idr-ls-distribution
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 19:52:51 -0000

On 10/5/15, 3:34 PM, "Jeffrey Haas" <jhaas@pfrc.org> wrote:

. . .
>>
>>> I was mostly wondering if the information is anywhere close to 4k or
>>>not.
>>> The implementation report doesn¹t say anything either. :-(
>>OK. I see your point. The problem presumably exists for the IGPs as well
>>(maybe
>>more for OSPF than for ISIS).
>>Anyone in the DR WG want to do the math?
>
>Not particularly.  I think this is a case where we'd really want the IGP
>experts to give us ideas of max message sizes and then we'd double-check
>BGP-LS.
>
>That said, draft-ietf-idr-bgp-extended-messages is intended to help with
>these sorts of situations.  (Although that's not broadly implemented yet.)

Exactly!  If we're anywhere close (I don't think so) then we might need
the extended-messages faster..

Alvaro.