IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Idr] [BULK] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-22: (with COMMENT)

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Tue, 21 April 2020 18:51 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02853A043D; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tix.at
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DftIpi6l4tN8; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fbsd.host (mail.fbsd.host [IPv6:2001:858:58::22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A10EF3A044A; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 11:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tix.at; s=rev1; h=References:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Date:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type :Message-Id:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=L+ZTzy6VyCXSvQuyKGUrKHRWbQpH9GIGli2dVYdBQ3I=; b=fFThA3JJ9ZdcHkaJ8Y4x95M+ov Be/oeCoaDWB0B+ZS5H4+EqPHxJDMQ46H6Au6kL/QmjUlnTDzn8ipOlIR/yrYjWwSqs/JL9Qxmld2t VwMA9IquulIbfR2QtaTxEV7jd3IXwyNUTKW84AlWrPjYN/p8W1ita6Lz2caXcw9VrstR5h2060zfA BPxrJ0cBC30IP+WT+Ch5P7IVICPcA2YggS50FufSzVPOQtS1+IUDKDUm0yEVNwsnaCapV4t1Jrxw5 ocsa5e4lb2BIcXxe0vJLIH5rGGqf/7LsuBs9Bw4mk1AAZSwVAc/YqYriUBQVJbNyKGnASFmcazfin NDUPGYyg==;
Received: from [89.144.223.235] (helo=[192.168.88.217]) by mail.fbsd.host with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92.3) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1jQxz3-000Mg1-9T; Tue, 21 Apr 2020 20:51:02 +0200
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
Message-Id: <E80B8129-FBEB-4A08-9277-151FA1D0432C@tix.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_AA1B7469-5551-4ABC-8068-EDC58C99CA0C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 20:50:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: <158747342032.7754.13195829798543429586@ietfa.amsl.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis@ietf.org, idr-chairs@ietf.org, idr@ietf.org, Jie Dong <jie.dong@huawei.com>, aretana.ietf@gmail.com
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
References: <158747342032.7754.13195829798543429586@ietfa.amsl.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
X-Scanned-By: primary on mail.fbsd.host (78.142.178.22); Tue, 21 Apr 2020 20:51:01 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/v4MnOWz7jDVR83Xm0FdjvAvlu88>
Subject: Re: [Idr] [BULK] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 18:51:45 -0000

Hi Roman,

Thanks for your review. I will deal with the feedback and will send an update soon.

Cheers Christoph

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 21.04.2020, at 14:50, Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis-22: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-idr-rfc5575bis/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Thanks for this approachable update.  One item of feedback:
> 
> Appendix A.  This python code is referenced in Section 5.1.  Is it intended to
> be normative?  If not, then please say so.  If it is, I’d recommend include the
> full snippet of flowspec-cmp code in the document in addition to making the
> github reference.  Likewise, please provide a reference for Python 3.
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email