Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-v6.txt (3/3 to 3/17)

Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at> Wed, 04 March 2020 08:34 UTC

Return-Path: <c@tix.at>
X-Original-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: idr@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 407493A08B0 for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 00:34:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6zmn3EeD48ko for <idr@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 00:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hated.at (mail.hated.at [IPv6:2001:858:2:8::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD133A08BB for <idr@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 00:34:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gaestewlan.nextlayer.at ([92.60.6.196] helo=[192.168.68.95]) by mail.hated.at with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <c@tix.at>) id 1j9PU8-0003Qv-MZ; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 09:34:34 +0100
From: Christoph Loibl <c@tix.at>
Message-Id: <DC39CA22-7A9B-48B5-916D-F3AC2714B964@tix.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_67BA352D-7F92-45AF-8014-5DF6C1845AD1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3608.60.0.2.5\))
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 09:34:30 +0100
In-Reply-To: <01ad01d5f17c$643855f0$2ca901d0$@ndzh.com>
Cc: "idr@ietf. org" <idr@ietf.org>
To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
References: <01ad01d5f17c$643855f0$2ca901d0$@ndzh.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.60.0.2.5)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/idr/vBmcNKArYiXHR1Mnx-y6VO34zV8>
Subject: Re: [Idr] draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-v6.txt (3/3 to 3/17)
X-BeenThere: idr@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Inter-Domain Routing <idr.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/idr/>
List-Post: <mailto:idr@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>, <mailto:idr-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2020 08:34:46 -0000

Hi, 

As editor of the draft I think this draft is ready for publication. It is implemented and actively used technology for quite a while now. Furthermore, after the last edit it nicely fits to rfc5575bis. 

Cheers Christoph

-- 
Christoph Loibl
c@tix.at | CL8-RIPE | PGP-Key-ID: 0x4B2C0055 | http://www.nextlayer.at



> On 03.03.2020, at 17:54, Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com> wrote:
> 
> Greetings: 
>  
> This begins a 2 week WG last call on draft-ietf-idr-flowspec-v6.txt from 3/3/ to 3/17. 
> You can access the draft at: 
>  
> [WG chair hat on]
>  
> The IESG has indicated a v6 specification for flow specification should accompany the RFC5575bis update.
> [WG chat hat off] 
>  
> Since I am a co-author on this draft, John will judge the group consensus.
>  
> Cheerily, Susan Hares  
> _______________________________________________
> Idr mailing list
> Idr@ietf.org <mailto:Idr@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/idr>